PZVSX vs. DHSCX
PZVSX (Pzena Small Cap Value Fund) and DHSCX (Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PZVSX returned 8.70%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for DHSCX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PZVSX charges 1.52%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for DHSCX.
Performance
PZVSX vs. DHSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZVSX achieves a 23.93% return, which is significantly lower than DHSCX's 27.91% return.
PZVSX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- YTD
- 23.93%
- 1Y
- 32.08%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.33%
DHSCX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 19.95%
- YTD
- 27.91%
- 1Y
- 42.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PZVSX vs. DHSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZVSX Pzena Small Cap Value Fund | 23.93% | -4.94% | 1.62% | 25.62% | -5.33% | 27.93% | -0.09% | 24.84% | -15.19% | 2.10% |
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund | 27.91% | 11.48% | 12.75% | 23.99% | -15.11% | 32.30% | -0.54% | 21.45% | -15.23% | 10.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZVSX and DHSCX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between PZVSX and DHSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZVSX vs. DHSCX — Risk / Return Rank
PZVSX
DHSCX
PZVSX vs. DHSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX) and Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PZVSX | DHSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.33 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 3.47 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 11.34 | -6.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PZVSX vs. DHSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZVSX drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, roughly equal to the maximum DHSCX drawdown of -53.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZVSX and DHSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZVSX | DHSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.22% | -53.15% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -11.02% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.43% | -28.41% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.43% | -28.41% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -1.40% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.34% | -8.27% | -2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.02% | 3.38% | +2.64% |
Volatility
PZVSX vs. DHSCX - Volatility Comparison
Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX) and Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) have volatilities of 5.75% and 5.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZVSX | DHSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 5.78% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | 14.11% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.76% | 19.87% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 21.49% | +2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.36% | 22.24% | +5.12% |
PZVSX vs. DHSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZVSX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than DHSCX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZVSX vs. DHSCX - Dividend Comparison
PZVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than DHSCX's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund | 4.54% | 5.80% | 16.10% | 30.73% | 18.17% | 17.43% | 0.32% | 6.94% | 10.29% | 6.68% | 2.50% | 1.63% |
PZVSX Pzena Small Cap Value Fund | 1.88% | 2.33% | 7.03% | 0.45% | 17.31% | 1.25% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 4.56% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZVSX and DHSCX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHSCX has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to PZVSX (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZVSX dropped -54.22% vs DHSCX's -53.15%.
DHSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZVSX and DHSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer