PZT vs. TAXT
PZT (Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) and TAXT (Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - PZT tracks the ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni while TAXT tracks the ICE Focused Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PZT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXT.
Performance
PZT vs. TAXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZT achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly higher than TAXT's 1.59% return.
PZT
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 9.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
TAXT
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PZT vs. TAXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.19% | 5.96% |
TAXT Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.59% | 3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZT and TAXT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZT vs. TAXT — Risk / Return Rank
PZT
TAXT
PZT vs. TAXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZT | TAXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.57 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZT | TAXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 2.84 | -2.47 |
Drawdowns
PZT vs. TAXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZT drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, which is greater than TAXT's maximum drawdown of -2.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZT and TAXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZT | TAXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -2.49% | -20.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -0.47% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -0.47% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | — | — |
Volatility
PZT vs. TAXT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZT | TAXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.74% | 2.53% | +2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.63% | 2.53% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 2.53% | +4.43% |
PZT vs. TAXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXT's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZT vs. TAXT - Dividend Comparison
PZT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than TAXT's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.57% | 3.43% | 3.04% | 2.82% | 2.66% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 2.73% | 3.01% | 2.94% | 3.36% | 3.40% |
TAXT Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 2.54% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZT and TAXT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PZT.
PZT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 2.54% for TAXT.
PZT tracks ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni, while TAXT tracks ICE Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PZT and 0.05% for TAXT.
Find the right allocation for PZT and TAXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer