PZT vs. TAXS
PZT (Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) and TAXS (Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - PZT tracks the ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni while TAXS tracks the ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PZT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXS.
Performance
PZT vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZT achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly higher than TAXS's 1.06% return.
PZT
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 3.37%
- 6M
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
TAXS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PZT vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.37% | 5.58% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.06% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZT and TAXS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZT vs. TAXS — Risk / Return Rank
PZT
TAXS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PZT vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PZT | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.51 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PZT vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZT drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZT and TAXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZT | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -0.84% | -21.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.01% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -0.22% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | — | — |
Volatility
PZT vs. TAXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZT | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.70% | 0.99% | +3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.64% | 0.99% | +5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 0.99% | +5.94% |
PZT vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZT vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison
PZT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than TAXS's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.60% | 3.43% | 3.04% | 2.82% | 2.66% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 2.73% | 3.01% | 2.94% | 3.36% | 3.40% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.82% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZT and TAXS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PZT.
PZT has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.82% for TAXS.
PZT tracks ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni, while TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PZT and 0.05% for TAXS.
Find the right allocation for PZT and TAXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer