PZT vs. DBC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PZT (Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PZT is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PZT returned 1.90%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for DBC. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. PZT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.

Performance

PZT vs. DBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZT achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 35.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PZT has underperformed DBC with an annualized return of 1.90%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.10% annualized return.

PZT

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 3.17%
• 1Y: 9.52%
• 3Y*: 3.35%
• 5Y*: -0.03%
• 10Y*: 1.90%

DBC

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -3.32%
• YTD: 35.47%
• 6M: 35.36%
• 1Y: 45.90%
• 3Y*: 15.09%
• 5Y*: 12.78%
• 10Y*: 9.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZT vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF	2.87%	1.76%	1.17%	7.57%	-13.04%	2.67%	5.89%	9.52%	-0.55%	6.21%
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund	35.47%	8.10%	2.18%	-6.19%	19.34%	41.36%	-7.84%	11.84%	-11.63%	4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PZT and DBC is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2007	-0.06

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PZT and DBC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.06 to -0.27, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

PZT vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZT

PZT Risk / Return Rank: 61
PZT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PZT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PZT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
PZT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
PZT Martin Ratio Rank: 58

DBC

DBC Risk / Return Rank: 75
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZT vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PZT	DBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.47	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	3.16	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.43	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	6.54	-3.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.29	13.91	-3.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PZT vs. DBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZT Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the DBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZT and DBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PZT	DBC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	2.47	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.67	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.51	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.12	+0.26

Drawdowns

PZT vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZT drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZT and DBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PZT	DBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.73%	-76.36%	+53.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.17%	-7.05%	+3.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.00%	-13.82%	+4.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.13%	-27.34%	+8.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.13%	-41.71%	+22.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-21.64%	+20.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-46.22%	+42.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	3.31%	-2.38%

Volatility

PZT vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) is 2.10%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that PZT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PZT	DBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.10%	6.45%	-4.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.45%	15.75%	-12.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.75%	18.68%	-13.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.62%	19.18%	-12.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.96%	17.81%	-10.85%

PZT vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PZT vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison

PZT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than DBC's 2.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund	2.46%	3.33%	5.22%	4.94%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	1.59%	1.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF	3.58%	3.43%	3.04%	2.82%	2.66%	2.77%	2.55%	2.73%	3.01%	2.94%	3.36%	3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PZT and DBC in my portfolio?

PZT and DBC have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PZT or DBC?

DBC has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to PZT (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZT dropped -22.73% vs DBC's -76.36%.

Which ETF is better, PZT or DBC?

On 10-year performance, DBC leads with 9.10% vs 1.90% for PZT. On fees, PZT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, PZT has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PZT or DBC?

Over the 10-year period, DBC has performed better with a 9.10% return vs 1.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PZT or DBC?

PZT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PZT or DBC?

PZT has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 2.46% for DBC.

What is the main difference between PZT and DBC?

PZT is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DBC is Commodities. PZT tracks ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PZT and 0.85% for DBC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.