PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZRIX vs. LIAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZRIX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZRIX achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 26.97% return.


PZRIX

1D
0.39%
1M
1.65%
YTD
14.72%
6M
17.89%
1Y
33.40%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
10.28%

LIAGX

1D
0.93%
1M
9.49%
YTD
26.97%
6M
28.29%
1Y
39.93%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZRIX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PZRIX
PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund
14.72%34.05%3.29%19.31%-9.11%-3.58%
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
26.97%25.09%9.43%15.73%-26.63%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PZRIX and LIAGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021

0.79

The correlation between PZRIX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZRIX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZRIX
PZRIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PZRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PZRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LIAGX
LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZRIX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PZRIXLIAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.02

2.02

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.05

2.76

+1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.36

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

2.86

+1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.54

11.49

+4.05

PZRIX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZRIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZRIX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PZRIXLIAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

2.02

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.44

+0.17

Drawdowns

PZRIX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZRIX drawdown since its inception was -43.53%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZRIX and LIAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZRIXLIAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.53%

-37.87%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-14.56%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.81%

-17.11%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

0.00%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-13.25%

+4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

3.62%

-1.36%

Volatility

PZRIX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX) is 3.13%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that PZRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZRIXLIAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

8.34%

-5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

18.00%

-9.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

20.72%

-9.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

18.80%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

18.80%

-1.86%

PZRIX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZRIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZRIX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

PZRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
0.30%0.38%0.48%0.71%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PZRIX
PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund
5.72%6.56%6.70%9.19%8.80%11.99%2.04%6.32%2.80%4.13%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZRIX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIAGX has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to PZRIX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZRIX dropped -43.53% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

PZRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZRIX and LIAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer