PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZIEX vs. JEMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZIEX vs. JEMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZIEX achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly lower than JEMSX's 20.99% return. Over the past 10 years, PZIEX has outperformed JEMSX with an annualized return of 11.00%, while JEMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.80% annualized return.


PZIEX

1D
0.35%
1M
2.58%
6M
-1.10%
YTD
11.34%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
11.00%
ALL TIME*
9.21%

JEMSX

1D
4.24%
1M
-4.53%
6M
9.76%
YTD
20.99%
1Y
45.52%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
9.80%
ALL TIME*
5.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PZIEX vs. JEMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PZIEX
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class
11.34%35.49%4.54%20.73%-5.67%6.65%8.43%13.57%-10.23%29.98%
JEMSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
20.99%40.13%3.39%7.21%-25.77%-10.36%34.73%31.96%-16.02%42.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PZIEX and JEMSX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.65

The correlation between PZIEX and JEMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZIEX vs. JEMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PZIEX
PZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

JEMSX
JEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PZIEX vs. JEMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PZIEXJEMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.90

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.16

10.28

-5.12

PZIEX vs. JEMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the JEMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZIEX and JEMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PZIEX vs. JEMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZIEX drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum JEMSX drawdown of -62.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZIEX and JEMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZIEXJEMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.59%

-62.07%

+17.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-14.85%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.40%

-15.10%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.22%

-43.40%

+19.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

-49.59%

+5.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.07%

-11.24%

+4.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-21.61%

+12.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

4.18%

+0.68%

Volatility

PZIEX vs. JEMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) is 4.14%, while JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that PZIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZIEXJEMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

10.61%

-6.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.76%

22.38%

-8.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.96%

24.77%

-8.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

20.23%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.33%

19.91%

-4.58%

PZIEX vs. JEMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZIEX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than JEMSX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZIEX vs. JEMSX - Dividend Comparison

PZIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than JEMSX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JEMSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
1.04%1.26%1.41%1.45%0.37%3.80%0.09%0.76%0.87%0.39%0.66%0.67%
PZIEX
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class
4.32%4.81%7.38%5.79%2.08%2.79%1.28%6.32%1.28%1.41%0.98%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZIEX and JEMSX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEMSX has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to PZIEX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZIEX dropped -44.59% vs JEMSX's -62.07%.

JEMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZIEX and JEMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer