PYZ vs. REMX
PYZ (Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PYZ is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index, while REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PYZ returned 8.33%/yr vs 6.60%/yr for REMX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PYZ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.
Performance
PYZ vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYZ achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than REMX's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PYZ has outperformed REMX with an annualized return of 8.33%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.60% annualized return.
PYZ
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -9.41%
- 6M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- 12.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
REMX
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- -20.14%
- 6M
- -14.15%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 67.59%
- 3Y*
- -2.80%
- 5Y*
- -2.21%
- 10Y*
- 6.60%
PYZ vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF | 8.61% | 28.01% | 2.54% | 9.56% | -15.45% | 32.68% | 15.39% | 20.66% | -24.33% | 20.01% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 3.18% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 79.81% | 64.82% | 0.74% | -49.63% | 82.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYZ and REMX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010 | 0.62 |
The correlation between PYZ and REMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
PYZ vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PYZ
REMX
Basic Materials
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
PYZ
REMX
Industrials
PYZ
REMX
-
Consumer Cyclical
PYZ
REMX
-
Energy
PYZ
REMX
-
Consumer Defensive
PYZ
REMX
-
Financial Services
PYZ
REMX
-
Communication Services
PYZ
-
REMX
-
Healthcare
PYZ
-
REMX
-
Real Estate
PYZ
-
REMX
-
Technology
PYZ
-
REMX
-
Utilities
PYZ
-
REMX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYZ vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
PYZ
REMX
PYZ vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYZ | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.23 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 2.24 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 6.58 | -2.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYZ vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYZ drawdown since its inception was -65.15%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYZ and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYZ | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.15% | -90.20% | +25.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.75% | -30.37% | +12.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.74% | -61.39% | +34.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.97% | -73.34% | +40.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.46% | -73.34% | +20.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.50% | -65.08% | +54.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.60% | -66.80% | +54.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 10.30% | -4.57% |
Volatility
PYZ vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) is 6.90%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that PYZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYZ | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 14.22% | -7.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.54% | 37.06% | -16.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.56% | 49.55% | -22.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 40.65% | -15.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 37.19% | -10.78% |
PYZ vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYZ vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
PYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than REMX's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF | 0.50% | 0.72% | 1.13% | 1.19% | 1.18% | 0.33% | 1.04% | 1.38% | 1.20% | 0.53% | 1.07% | 1.25% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.71% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYZ and REMX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REMX has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to PYZ (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYZ dropped -65.15% vs REMX's -90.20%.
On 10-year performance, PYZ leads with 8.33% vs 6.60% for REMX. On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PYZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PYZ has performed better with a 8.33% return vs 6.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PYZ.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.50% for PYZ.
PYZ is categorized as Momentum, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. PYZ tracks Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PYZ and 0.59% for REMX.
REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYZ and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer