PYSBX vs. FUMBX
PYSBX (Payden Low Duration Fund) and FUMBX (Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PYSBX returned 2.39%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for FUMBX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PYSBX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FUMBX.
Performance
PYSBX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYSBX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than FUMBX's -0.01% return.
PYSBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
FUMBX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 2.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.07%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
PYSBX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYSBX Payden Low Duration Fund | 0.32% | 5.72% | 5.03% | 4.96% | -3.40% | -0.23% | 3.46% | 3.92% | 1.00% | 0.06% |
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | -0.01% | 5.83% | 3.25% | 4.47% | -5.84% | -1.38% | 4.22% | 4.19% | 1.47% | -0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYSBX and FUMBX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.75 |
The correlation between PYSBX and FUMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYSBX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank
PYSBX
FUMBX
PYSBX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYSBX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.30 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 2.02 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.97 | 5.99 | +2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYSBX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYSBX drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, smaller than the maximum FUMBX drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYSBX and FUMBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYSBX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -8.83% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.41% | -1.54% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.41% | -1.57% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.46% | -8.60% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.96% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | -1.85% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 0.52% | -0.12% |
Volatility
PYSBX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX) is 0.64%, while Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) has a volatility of 0.72%. This indicates that PYSBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYSBX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 0.72% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.51% | 1.56% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00% | 2.08% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.14% | 2.92% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.91% | 2.49% | -0.58% |
PYSBX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYSBX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYSBX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison
PYSBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than FUMBX's 3.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.77% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 1.64% | 0.86% | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PYSBX Payden Low Duration Fund | 4.41% | 4.32% | 4.27% | 2.93% | 1.87% | 1.06% | 2.50% | 2.14% | 2.30% | 1.57% | 1.24% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYSBX and FUMBX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUMBX has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to PYSBX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYSBX dropped -6.65% vs FUMBX's -8.83%.
PYSBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYSBX and FUMBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer