PYPG vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PYPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PYPG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. PYPG is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, PYPG returned -74.35% vs 77.38% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. PYPG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

PYPG vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYPG achieves a -54.04% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.

PYPG

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -16.19%
• YTD: -54.04%
• 6M: -59.26%
• 1Y: -74.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBO

• 1D: -2.66%
• 1M: -3.39%
• YTD: 79.84%
• 6M: 74.51%
• 1Y: 77.38%
• 3Y*: 20.83%
• 5Y*: 15.36%
• 10Y*: 10.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYPG vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF	-54.04%	-16.47%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	79.84%	-1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PYPG and DBO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

PYPG vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYPG

PYPG Risk / Return Rank: 1
PYPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
PYPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PYPG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PYPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
PYPG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 65
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYPG vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYPG	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	2.25	-3.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.56	2.85	-4.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.36	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	4.28	-5.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	8.69	-10.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYPG vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYPG Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYPG and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYPG	DBO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.96	2.25	-3.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.72	0.02	-0.74

Drawdowns

PYPG vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYPG drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPG and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYPG	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.52%	-90.18%	+10.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.52%	-18.19%	-61.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.03%	-52.68%	-24.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.13%	-62.25%	+24.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	50.39%	8.94%	+41.45%

Volatility

PYPG vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) have volatilities of 12.24% and 12.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYPG	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.24%	12.79%	-0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	68.29%	28.32%	+39.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.89%	34.58%	+43.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.39%	32.31%	+46.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.39%	31.79%	+46.60%

PYPG vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYPG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYPG vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

PYPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	1.95%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYPG and DBO in my portfolio?

PYPG and DBO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYPG or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to PYPG (12.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPG dropped -79.52% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, PYPG or DBO?

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 77.38% vs -74.35% for PYPG. On fees, PYPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PYPG has been the lower-risk option at 12.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PYPG or DBO?

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 77.38% return vs -74.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PYPG or DBO?

PYPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PYPG or DBO?

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.00% for PYPG.

What is the main difference between PYPG and DBO?

PYPG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PYPG and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.