PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYLD vs. JPIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYLD vs. JPIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYLD achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than JPIE's 1.43% return.


PYLD

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.31%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JPIE

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.83%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
6.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYLD vs. JPIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
0.95%9.57%7.69%5.60%
JPIE
JPMorgan Income ETF
1.43%7.39%6.32%4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PYLD and JPIE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023

0.74

The correlation between PYLD and JPIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYLD vs. JPIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

JPIE
JPIE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
JPIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPIE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
JPIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYLD vs. JPIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYLDJPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.84

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

5.16

-2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

25.53

-15.09

PYLD vs. JPIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is lower than the JPIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYLD and JPIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYLDJPIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

3.73

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.04

0.98

+1.06

Drawdowns

PYLD vs. JPIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYLD drawdown since its inception was -4.52%, smaller than the maximum JPIE drawdown of -9.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLD and JPIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYLDJPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-9.96%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-1.15%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.13%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.65%

-2.10%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.23%

+0.48%

Volatility

PYLD vs. JPIE - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE) at 0.60%. This indicates that PYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYLDJPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

0.60%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

1.28%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

1.59%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.99%

3.52%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.99%

3.52%

+0.47%

PYLD vs. JPIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYLD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JPIE's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYLD vs. JPIE - Dividend Comparison

PYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than JPIE's 5.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JPIE
JPMorgan Income ETF
5.62%5.65%6.11%5.70%4.49%0.63%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.30%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYLD and JPIE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYLD has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to JPIE (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYLD dropped -4.52% vs JPIE's -9.96%.

On 1-year performance, PYLD leads with 7.40% vs 5.90% for JPIE. On fees, JPIE is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, JPIE has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PYLD has performed better with a 7.40% return vs 5.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPIE is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PYLD.

PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.30%, compared with 5.62% for JPIE.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PYLD and 0.41% for JPIE.

JPIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYLD and JPIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer