PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYLD vs. HYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYLD vs. HYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYLD achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than HYS's 1.33% return.


PYLD

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.31%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYS

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.83%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
5.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYLD vs. HYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PYLD and HYS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023

0.56

The correlation between PYLD and HYS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

PYLD vs. HYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PYLD
HYS

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

PYLD
100.0%
HYS

-

Basic Materials

PYLD

-

HYS

-

Communication Services

PYLD

-

HYS
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PYLD

-

HYS

-

Consumer Defensive

PYLD

-

HYS

-

Financial Services

PYLD

-

HYS

-

Healthcare

PYLD

-

HYS

-

Industrials

PYLD

-

HYS

-

Real Estate

PYLD

-

HYS

-

Technology

PYLD

-

HYS

-

Utilities

PYLD

-

HYS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYLD vs. HYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

HYS
HYS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYLD vs. HYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYLDHYSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.39

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.77

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

15.35

-4.91

PYLD vs. HYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the HYS Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYLD and HYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYLDHYSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.04

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.04

0.81

+1.23

Drawdowns

PYLD vs. HYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYLD drawdown since its inception was -4.52%, smaller than the maximum HYS drawdown of -20.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLD and HYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYLDHYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-20.91%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-1.88%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.14%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.65%

-1.53%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.46%

+0.25%

Volatility

PYLD vs. HYS - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) have volatilities of 1.24% and 1.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYLDHYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

1.23%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

2.74%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

3.47%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.99%

6.26%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.99%

6.84%

-2.85%

PYLD vs. HYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYLD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than HYS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYLD vs. HYS - Dividend Comparison

PYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, less than HYS's 7.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
7.36%7.20%7.43%6.44%5.01%3.74%4.52%4.98%4.64%5.01%5.13%5.22%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.30%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYLD and HYS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYLD has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to HYS (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYLD dropped -4.52% vs HYS's -20.91%.

On 1-year performance, PYLD leads with 7.40% vs 7.07% for HYS. On fees, PYLD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PYLD has performed better with a 7.40% return vs 7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PYLD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for HYS.

HYS has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 6.30% for PYLD.

PYLD is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while HYS is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PYLD and 0.56% for HYS.

PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYLD and HYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer