PYLD vs. CGCB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB).

PYLD and CGCB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PYLD is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 21, 2023. CGCB is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023.

Performance

PYLD vs. CGCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PYLD vs. CGCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	-0.92%	9.57%	7.69%	7.01%
CGCB Capital Group Core Bond ETF	-0.07%	7.29%	1.44%	6.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYLD achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly lower than CGCB's -0.07% return.

PYLD

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -2.28%
• YTD: -0.92%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 5.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGCB

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -1.94%
• YTD: -0.07%
• 6M: 0.88%
• 1Y: 4.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYLD vs. CGCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYLD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CGCB's 0.27% expense ratio.

PYLD

PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund

CGCB

Capital Group Core Bond ETF

Return for Risk

PYLD vs. CGCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYLD

PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 83
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 76

CGCB

CGCB Risk / Return Rank: 52
CGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
CGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYLD vs. CGCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYLD	CGCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	0.93	+0.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	1.30	+1.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.17	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	1.62	+0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.60	4.49	+3.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYLD vs. CGCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the CGCB Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYLD and CGCB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYLD	CGCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	0.93	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.99	1.13	+0.85

Correlation

The correlation between PYLD and CGCB is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PYLD vs. CGCB - Dividend Comparison

PYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, more than CGCB's 4.23% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	6.36%	6.21%	6.40%	2.72%
CGCB Capital Group Core Bond ETF	4.23%	4.22%	3.99%	0.95%

Drawdowns

PYLD vs. CGCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYLD drawdown since its inception was -4.52%, smaller than the maximum CGCB drawdown of -5.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLD and CGCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYLD	CGCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-5.17%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.25%	-2.72%	-0.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.28%	-1.94%	-0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.64%	-1.32%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	0.98%	-0.19%

Volatility

PYLD vs. CGCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) is 1.61%, while Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that PYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYLD	CGCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.61%	1.73%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.12%	2.62%	-0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.43%	4.57%	-1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.00%	5.48%	-1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.00%	5.48%	-1.48%