PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYLD vs. CDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYLD vs. CDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and Simplify High Yield ETF (CDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYLD achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than CDX's -2.21% return.


PYLD

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.42%
6M
1.56%
YTD
1.56%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
10Y*

CDX

1D
-0.80%
1M
0.28%
6M
-2.21%
YTD
-2.21%
1Y
-2.43%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYLD vs. CDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
1.56%9.57%7.69%5.46%
CDX
Simplify High Yield ETF
-2.21%9.51%7.71%7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PYLD and CDX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYLD vs. CDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CDX
CDX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYLD vs. CDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and Simplify High Yield ETF (CDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYLDCDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.94

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

-0.58

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

-1.26

+10.03

PYLD vs. CDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the CDX Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYLD and CDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYLD vs. CDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYLD drawdown since its inception was -4.52%, smaller than the maximum CDX drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLD and CDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYLDCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-13.24%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-4.18%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.52%

-8.88%

+4.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-7.19%

+6.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

-4.37%

+3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

1.94%

-1.22%

Volatility

PYLD vs. CDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) is 1.09%, while Simplify High Yield ETF (CDX) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that PYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYLDCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.72%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

4.92%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

5.80%

-2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.98%

11.03%

-7.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.98%

11.03%

-7.05%

PYLD vs. CDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYLD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CDX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYLD vs. CDX - Dividend Comparison

PYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, less than CDX's 8.31% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CDX
Simplify High Yield ETF
8.31%7.18%12.60%5.26%7.51%
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.33%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYLD and CDX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDX has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to PYLD (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYLD dropped -4.52% vs CDX's -13.24%.

On 3-year performance, PYLD leads with 8.06% vs 7.39% for CDX. On fees, CDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PYLD has performed better with a 8.06% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PYLD.

CDX has the higher dividend yield at 8.31%, compared with 6.33% for PYLD.

PYLD is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while CDX is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PYLD and 0.25% for CDX.

PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYLD and CDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer