PYLD vs. CARY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PYLD (PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and CARY (Angel Oak Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PYLD returned 7.40% vs 6.94% for CARY. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PYLD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for CARY.

Performance

PYLD vs. CARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYLD achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than CARY's 1.74% return.

PYLD

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 0.95%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 7.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CARY

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 1.74%
• 6M: 2.13%
• 1Y: 6.94%
• 3Y*: 7.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYLD vs. CARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	0.95%	9.57%	7.69%	5.60%
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	1.74%	7.54%	6.93%	5.45%

Correlation

The correlation between PYLD and CARY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023	0.63

The correlation between PYLD and CARY shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PYLD vs. CARY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PYLD	CARY
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PYLD vs. CARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYLD

PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 66
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 58

CARY

CARY Risk / Return Rank: 94
CARY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CARY Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CARY Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CARY Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CARY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYLD vs. CARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYLD	CARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	3.96	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	6.28	-2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.89	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	5.45	-3.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.44	23.64	-13.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYLD vs. CARY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is lower than the CARY Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYLD and CARY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYLD	CARY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	3.96	-1.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.04	2.65	-0.60

Drawdowns

PYLD vs. CARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYLD drawdown since its inception was -4.52%, which is greater than CARY's maximum drawdown of -1.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLD and CARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYLD	CARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-1.96%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.25%	-1.28%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-0.14%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.65%	-0.33%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.71%	0.29%	+0.42%

Volatility

PYLD vs. CARY - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) at 0.56%. This indicates that PYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYLD	CARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	0.56%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.50%	1.30%	+1.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.08%	1.76%	+1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.99%	2.74%	+1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.99%	2.74%	+1.25%

PYLD vs. CARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYLD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CARY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYLD vs. CARY - Dividend Comparison

PYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than CARY's 5.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	5.93%	6.13%	6.10%	6.38%	0.48%
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	6.30%	6.21%	6.40%	2.72%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYLD and CARY in my portfolio?

PYLD and CARY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYLD or CARY?

PYLD has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to CARY (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYLD dropped -4.52% vs CARY's -1.96%.

Which ETF is better, PYLD or CARY?

On 1-year performance, PYLD leads with 7.40% vs 6.94% for CARY. On fees, PYLD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, CARY has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PYLD or CARY?

Over the 1-year period, PYLD has performed better with a 7.40% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PYLD or CARY?

PYLD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PYLD or CARY?

PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.30%, compared with 5.93% for CARY.

What is the main difference between PYLD and CARY?

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PYLD and 0.80% for CARY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CARY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.