PYHRX vs. PYSGX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PYHRX (Payden High Income Fund) and PYSGX (Payden Strategic Income Fund) are both mutual funds - PYHRX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Paydenfunds, while PYSGX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Paydenfunds. Over the past 10 years, PYHRX returned 13.50%/yr vs 3.21%/yr for PYSGX. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PYHRX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PYSGX.

Performance

PYHRX vs. PYSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) and Payden Strategic Income Fund (PYSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYHRX achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly higher than PYSGX's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PYHRX has outperformed PYSGX with an annualized return of 13.50%, while PYSGX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.21% annualized return.

PYHRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 1.65%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 1Y: 6.56%
• 3Y*: 37.05%
• 5Y*: 20.34%
• 10Y*: 13.50%
• ALL TIME*: 8.17%

PYSGX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.48%
• 6M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.49%
• 1Y: 3.31%
• 3Y*: 5.65%
• 5Y*: 2.52%
• 10Y*: 3.21%
• ALL TIME*: 3.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PYSGX Payden Strategic Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PYHRX vs. PYSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	2.35%	117.46%	8.13%	14.73%	-9.76%	6.62%	7.38%	16.75%	-2.85%	6.54%
PYSGX Payden Strategic Income Fund	0.49%	6.85%	5.46%	7.42%	-6.61%	1.72%	6.20%	8.33%	-0.52%	4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PYHRX and PYSGX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.49

The correlation between PYHRX and PYSGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.64 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PYHRX vs. PYSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PYHRX

PYHRX Risk / Return Rank: 93
PYHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PYHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PYHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PYHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PYHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

PYSGX

PYSGX Risk / Return Rank: 60
PYSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
PYSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PYSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PYSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
PYSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PYHRX vs. PYSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) and Payden Strategic Income Fund (PYSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PYHRX	PYSGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	1.70	+0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.93	2.47	+1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.32	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	1.93	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.42	7.16	+9.26

PYHRX vs. PYSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the PYSGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYHRX and PYSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PYHRX vs. PYSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYHRX drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, which is greater than PYSGX's maximum drawdown of -12.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYHRX and PYSGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYHRX	PYSGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.80%	-12.70%	-15.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.02%	-1.95%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.21%	-2.22%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.08%	-9.97%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.45%	-12.70%	-8.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-0.65%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.10%	-1.38%	-0.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.39%	0.52%	-0.13%

Volatility

PYHRX vs. PYSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) is 0.56%, while Payden Strategic Income Fund (PYSGX) has a volatility of 0.59%. This indicates that PYHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYHRX	PYSGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.56%	0.59%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.07%	1.83%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50%	2.21%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.84%	2.91%	+42.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.62%	2.86%	+29.76%

PYHRX vs. PYSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYHRX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PYSGX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYHRX vs. PYSGX - Dividend Comparison

PYHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than PYSGX's 4.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	6.42%	5.66%	7.20%	6.67%	6.05%	4.79%	4.99%	5.23%	5.88%	5.27%	5.24%	5.49%
PYSGX Payden Strategic Income Fund	4.91%	5.15%	5.22%	4.42%	3.76%	3.38%	2.90%	3.25%	3.27%	2.75%	2.70%	2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYHRX and PYSGX in my portfolio?

PYHRX and PYSGX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYHRX or PYSGX?

PYSGX has higher volatility (0.59%) compared to PYHRX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYHRX dropped -27.80% vs PYSGX's -12.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.