PYHRX vs. JAAA
PYHRX (Payden High Income Fund) and JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) are both funds - PYHRX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Paydenfunds, while JAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson. Over the past 5 years, PYHRX returned 5.08%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for JAAA. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYHRX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for JAAA.
Performance
PYHRX vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYHRX achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly higher than JAAA's 1.87% return.
PYHRX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 9.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
JAAA
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- —
PYHRX vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund | 2.36% | 8.73% | 8.13% | 14.73% | -9.76% | 6.62% | 5.00% |
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 1.87% | 5.16% | 7.43% | 8.59% | 0.49% | 1.39% | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYHRX and JAAA is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYHRX vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank
PYHRX
JAAA
PYHRX vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYHRX | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.89 | 2.69 | -0.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | 13.07 | -8.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.63 | 70.18 | -45.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYHRX | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76 | 5.98 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 2.87 | -2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 2.77 | -2.52 |
Drawdowns
PYHRX vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYHRX drawdown since its inception was -50.79%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYHRX and JAAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYHRX | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.79% | -2.64% | -48.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.02% | -0.39% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.79% | -1.46% | -49.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.79% | -2.64% | -48.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -0.25% | -1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 0.07% | +0.30% |
Volatility
PYHRX vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison
Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.13%. This indicates that PYHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYHRX | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 0.13% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.96% | 0.64% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46% | 0.85% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.06% | 1.68% | +49.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.29% | 1.64% | +34.65% |
PYHRX vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYHRX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JAAA's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYHRX vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison
PYHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than JAAA's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 5.00% | 5.30% | 6.35% | 6.11% | 2.74% | 1.21% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund | 6.42% | 6.81% | 7.20% | 6.67% | 6.05% | 4.79% | 4.99% | 5.23% | 5.88% | 5.27% | 5.24% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYHRX and JAAA have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYHRX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYHRX dropped -50.79% vs JAAA's -2.64%.
JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.98 vs 3.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYHRX and JAAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer