PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYGSX vs. PYHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYGSX vs. PYHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX) and Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYGSX achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than PYHRX's 2.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PYGSX has underperformed PYHRX with an annualized return of 2.45%, while PYHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.14% annualized return.


PYGSX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.64%
6M
1.07%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
2.45%

PYHRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.28%
6M
3.19%
1Y
9.12%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
5.06%
10Y*
6.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYGSX vs. PYHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYGSX
Payden Global Low Duration Fund
0.64%5.72%5.19%5.61%-3.38%0.17%3.14%4.77%0.58%1.90%
PYHRX
Payden High Income Fund
2.28%8.73%8.13%14.73%-9.76%6.62%7.38%16.75%-2.85%6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PYGSX and PYHRX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.25

Over the past year, PYGSX and PYHRX have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYGSX vs. PYHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYGSX
PYGSX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PYGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PYGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PYHRX
PYHRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PYHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PYHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYGSX vs. PYHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX) and Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYGSXPYHRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.58

3.76

-1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.17

5.91

-1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.89

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

4.59

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.07

24.81

-11.74

PYGSX vs. PYHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYGSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is lower than the PYHRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYGSX and PYHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYGSXPYHRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

3.76

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.38

0.10

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.41

0.17

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.08

0.26

+1.83

Drawdowns

PYGSX vs. PYHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYGSX drawdown since its inception was -7.29%, smaller than the maximum PYHRX drawdown of -50.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYGSX and PYHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYGSXPYHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-50.79%

+43.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.23%

-2.02%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.23%

-50.79%

+49.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.38%

-50.79%

+45.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.29%

-50.79%

+43.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-2.12%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

0.37%

-0.06%

Volatility

PYGSX vs. PYHRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX) is 0.48%, while Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) has a volatility of 0.76%. This indicates that PYGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYGSXPYHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

0.76%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.11%

1.96%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54%

2.46%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.88%

51.06%

-49.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.75%

36.29%

-34.54%

PYGSX vs. PYHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYGSX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than PYHRX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYGSX vs. PYHRX - Dividend Comparison

PYGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, less than PYHRX's 6.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYGSX
Payden Global Low Duration Fund
4.65%4.63%4.64%3.84%2.14%1.68%1.78%2.74%2.51%1.68%1.19%1.20%
PYHRX
Payden High Income Fund
6.43%6.81%7.20%6.67%6.05%4.79%4.99%5.23%5.88%5.27%5.24%5.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYGSX and PYHRX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYHRX has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to PYGSX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYGSX dropped -7.29% vs PYHRX's -50.79%.

PYHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYGSX and PYHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer