PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYGFX vs. PYELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYGFX vs. PYELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Global Fixed Income Fund (PYGFX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYGFX achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than PYELX's 1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, PYGFX has underperformed PYELX with an annualized return of 2.06%, while PYELX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.96% annualized return.


PYGFX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.75%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.64%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
2.06%

PYELX

1D
0.30%
1M
1.50%
YTD
1.20%
6M
2.01%
1Y
11.47%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
2.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYGFX vs. PYELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYGFX
Payden Global Fixed Income Fund
0.54%5.20%3.90%7.34%-12.37%-0.89%5.92%8.61%-0.26%4.11%
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
1.20%19.79%-3.48%13.16%-11.28%-7.83%1.79%13.92%-8.16%15.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PYGFX and PYELX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.26

Over the past year, PYGFX and PYELX have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYGFX vs. PYELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYGFX
PYGFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PYGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PYGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PYELX
PYELX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PYELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYELX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PYELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYELX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYGFX vs. PYELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Global Fixed Income Fund (PYGFX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYGFXPYELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.56

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.27

5.28

-1.01

PYGFX vs. PYELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the PYELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYGFX and PYELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYGFXPYELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.74

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.04

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.08

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.04

+1.17

Drawdowns

PYGFX vs. PYELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYGFX drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, smaller than the maximum PYELX drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYGFX and PYELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYGFXPYELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.94%

-56.98%

+41.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-7.22%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.25%

-50.49%

+46.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.94%

-51.98%

+36.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.94%

-52.62%

+36.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-2.59%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-16.80%

+14.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

2.13%

-1.10%

Volatility

PYGFX vs. PYELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Global Fixed Income Fund (PYGFX) is 1.28%, while Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) has a volatility of 2.13%. This indicates that PYGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYGFXPYELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

2.13%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

5.60%

-3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

6.52%

-3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.33%

50.60%

-46.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.66%

36.37%

-32.71%

PYGFX vs. PYELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYGFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PYELX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYGFX vs. PYELX - Dividend Comparison

PYGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than PYELX's 7.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
7.19%7.32%7.08%5.38%5.93%5.36%4.69%5.46%6.67%6.15%5.44%5.26%
PYGFX
Payden Global Fixed Income Fund
4.07%3.88%3.69%2.71%8.25%3.18%2.69%3.07%5.39%1.91%1.48%3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYGFX and PYELX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYELX has higher volatility (2.13%) compared to PYGFX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYGFX dropped -15.94% vs PYELX's -56.98%.

PYELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYGFX and PYELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer