PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PYF.TO vs. ETHH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PYF.TO vs. ETHH.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PYF.TO (Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF) and ETHH.TO (Purpose Ether ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PYF.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while ETHH.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PYF.TO returned 5.99%/yr vs -11.23%/yr for ETHH.TO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PYF.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO) and Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYF.TO achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly higher than ETHH.TO's -40.68% return.

PYF.TO

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.79%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.28%
1Y
2.22%
3Y*
6.48%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
4.63%

ETHH.TO

1D
-6.35%
1M
-23.78%
YTD
-40.68%
6M
-43.85%
1Y
-34.23%
3Y*
-5.23%
5Y*
-11.23%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYF.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PYF.TO
Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF		1.16%5.45%7.42%8.40%5.25%2.77%
ETHH.TO
Purpose Ether ETF		-40.68%-14.37%38.87%91.16%-69.16%51.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PYF.TO and ETHH.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF

Purpose Ether ETF

Often compared with PYF.TO:
PYF.TO vs. BTCC-B.TOPYF.TO vs. HBAL.TOPYF.TO vs. ZCON.TOPYF.TO vs. CEQT.TOPYF.TO vs. ZESG.TOPYF.TO vs. CSBG.NEOPYF.TO vs. MGRW.TO
Often compared with ETHH.TO:
ETHH.TO vs. ETC.TOETHH.TO vs. EBIT.TOETHH.TO vs. ETHX.TOETHH.TO vs. BTCC-B.TOETHH.TO vs. IBITETHH.TO vs. BTCX-B.TOETHH.TO vs. SOLL.TO

Return for Risk

PYF.TO vs. ETHH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PYF.TO
PYF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PYF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO
ETHH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYF.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO) and Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PYF.TOETHH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.71
-0.51

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.01
-0.41

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.95

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

-0.54

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.83

-0.89

+3.72

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYF.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYF.TO and ETHH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PYF.TOETHH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

-0.51

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

-0.16

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

-0.12

+0.82

Drawdowns

PYF.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYF.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, smaller than the maximum ETHH.TO drawdown of -79.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYF.TO and ETHH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PYF.TOETHH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.53%

-79.46%

+58.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-63.98%

+61.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.57%

-65.04%

+59.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.57%

-79.46%

+73.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-68.37%

+67.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-49.06%

+48.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

38.46%

-37.67%

Volatility

PYF.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO) is 1.18%, while Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) has a volatility of 11.33%. This indicates that PYF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PYF.TOETHH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

11.33%

-10.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

45.72%

-43.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

67.41%

-64.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.19%

70.71%

-65.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.67%

73.03%

-66.36%

Dividends

PYF.TO vs. ETHH.TO - Dividend Comparison

PYF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, while ETHH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ETHH.TO
Purpose Ether ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PYF.TO
Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF		7.36%7.84%7.66%7.47%5.78%5.74%5.69%5.29%5.38%5.83%6.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

PYF.TO and ETHH.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYF.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ETHH.TO is Cryptocurrency.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYF.TO and ETHH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer