PYELX vs. PYCBX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

PYELX (Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund) and PYCBX (Payden Core Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - PYELX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Paydenfunds, while PYCBX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Paydenfunds. Over the past 10 years, PYELX returned 9.80%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for PYCBX. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PYELX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PYCBX.

Performance

PYELX vs. PYCBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) and Payden Core Bond Fund (PYCBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYELX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than PYCBX's -0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PYELX has outperformed PYCBX with an annualized return of 9.80%, while PYCBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.82% annualized return.

PYELX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.01%
• 6M: -1.01%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 1Y: 8.40%
• 3Y*: 34.46%
• 5Y*: 17.63%
• 10Y*: 9.80%
• ALL TIME*: 6.13%

PYCBX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -0.89%
• 6M: -0.61%
• YTD: -0.40%
• 1Y: 2.36%
• 3Y*: 4.73%
• 5Y*: 0.01%
• 10Y*: 1.82%
• ALL TIME*: 4.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PYCBX Payden Core Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PYELX vs. PYCBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund	1.46%	139.58%	-3.48%	13.16%	-11.28%	-7.83%	1.79%	13.92%	-8.16%	15.38%
PYCBX Payden Core Bond Fund	-0.40%	7.69%	2.55%	6.57%	-13.55%	-1.00%	6.93%	9.27%	-1.26%	5.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PYELX and PYCBX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.22

Over the past year, PYELX and PYCBX have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PYELX vs. PYCBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PYELX

PYELX Risk / Return Rank: 34
PYELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PYELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PYELX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
PYELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
PYELX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

PYCBX

PYCBX Risk / Return Rank: 14
PYCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
PYCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
PYCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
PYCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
PYCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PYELX vs. PYCBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) and Payden Core Bond Fund (PYCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PYELX	PYCBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	0.68	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	0.98	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.12	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	0.83	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.78	2.01	+1.78

PYELX vs. PYCBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the PYCBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYELX and PYCBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PYELX vs. PYCBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYELX drawdown since its inception was -35.29%, which is greater than PYCBX's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYELX and PYCBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYELX	PYCBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.29%	-18.59%	-16.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-2.97%	-4.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.12%	-5.19%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.24%	-18.59%	-5.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.58%	-18.59%	-7.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.34%	-2.26%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.27%	-2.41%	-13.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	1.23%	+1.17%

Volatility

PYELX vs. PYCBX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to Payden Core Bond Fund (PYCBX) at 1.06%. This indicates that PYELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYCBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYELX	PYCBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.69%	1.06%	+0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.95%	2.97%	+2.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.75%	3.65%	+3.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.35%	5.75%	+39.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.69%	4.71%	+27.98%

PYELX vs. PYCBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYELX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PYCBX's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYELX vs. PYCBX - Dividend Comparison

PYELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, more than PYCBX's 4.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PYCBX Payden Core Bond Fund	4.62%	4.78%	4.63%	3.76%	3.21%	2.39%	3.96%	3.04%	3.27%	3.13%	3.85%	2.84%
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund	7.14%	6.28%	7.08%	5.38%	5.93%	5.36%	4.69%	5.46%	6.67%	6.15%	5.44%	5.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYELX and PYCBX in my portfolio?

PYELX and PYCBX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYELX or PYCBX?

PYELX has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to PYCBX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYELX dropped -35.29% vs PYCBX's -18.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.