PYELX vs. IMCDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX).
PYELX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011. IMCDX is managed by Voya. It was launched on Aug 8, 2012.
Performance
PYELX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PYELX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | -3.00% | 19.79% | -3.48% | 13.16% | -11.28% | -7.83% | 1.79% | 13.92% | -8.16% | 15.38% |
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 8.51% | -13.79% | 0.08% | 8.35% | 13.65% | -1.77% | 9.40% |
Returns By Period
PYELX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- -3.00%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 11.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
IMCDX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PYELX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYELX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PYELX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank
PYELX
IMCDX
PYELX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYELX | IMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.11 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.45 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYELX | IMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between PYELX and IMCDX is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PYELX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison
PYELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | 7.49% | 7.32% | 7.08% | 5.38% | 5.93% | 5.36% | 4.69% | 5.46% | 6.67% | 6.15% | 5.44% | 5.26% |
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.08% | 4.21% | 3.80% | 6.14% | 4.64% | 4.99% | 5.30% | 4.79% | 5.22% | 5.11% |
Drawdowns
PYELX vs. IMCDX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYELX | IMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | — | — |
Volatility
PYELX vs. IMCDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PYELX | IMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 111.80% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.59% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.37% | — | — |