PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYELX vs. IMCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PYELX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PYELX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
-3.00%19.79%-3.48%13.16%-11.28%-7.83%1.79%13.92%-8.16%15.38%
IMCDX
Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund
0.00%0.00%6.44%8.51%-13.79%0.08%8.35%13.65%-1.77%9.40%

Returns By Period


PYELX

1D
0.63%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-3.00%
6M
0.18%
1Y
11.73%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
2.42%

IMCDX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PYELX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYELX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

PYELX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYELX
PYELX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PYELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYELX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PYELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYELX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCDX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYELX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYELXIMCDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.45

PYELX vs. IMCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYELXIMCDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

Correlation

The correlation between PYELX and IMCDX is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PYELX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison

PYELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
7.49%7.32%7.08%5.38%5.93%5.36%4.69%5.46%6.67%6.15%5.44%5.26%
IMCDX
Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund
0.00%0.00%4.08%4.21%3.80%6.14%4.64%4.99%5.30%4.79%5.22%5.11%

Drawdowns

PYELX vs. IMCDX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PYELXIMCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

Volatility

PYELX vs. IMCDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PYELXIMCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

111.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.37%