PYCBX vs. PYCRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Payden Core Bond Fund (PYCBX) and Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund (PYCRX).
PYCBX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Dec 31, 1993. PYCRX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Performance
PYCBX vs. PYCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PYCBX vs. PYCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYCBX Payden Core Bond Fund | -0.24% | 7.69% | 2.55% | 6.57% | -13.55% | -1.00% | 6.93% | 9.27% | -1.26% | 5.25% |
PYCRX Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund | -0.26% | 6.37% | 2.57% | 6.16% | -6.38% | 0.76% | 5.58% | 8.21% | 0.57% | 6.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYCBX achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than PYCRX's -0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PYCBX has underperformed PYCRX with an annualized return of 2.16%, while PYCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.68% annualized return.
PYCBX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.65%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
PYCRX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PYCBX vs. PYCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYCBX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than PYCRX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PYCBX vs. PYCRX — Risk / Return Rank
PYCBX
PYCRX
PYCBX vs. PYCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Core Bond Fund (PYCBX) and Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund (PYCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYCBX | PYCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 1.10 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.46 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.33 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.42 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 5.07 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYCBX | PYCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.10 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.59 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.83 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 1.20 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between PYCBX and PYCRX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PYCBX vs. PYCRX - Dividend Comparison
PYCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than PYCRX's 3.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYCBX Payden Core Bond Fund | 4.67% | 4.78% | 4.63% | 3.76% | 3.21% | 2.39% | 3.96% | 3.04% | 3.27% | 3.13% | 3.85% | 2.84% |
PYCRX Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund | 3.47% | 4.58% | 4.06% | 2.78% | 1.82% | 1.23% | 3.72% | 4.89% | 2.43% | 2.28% | 3.47% | 3.34% |
Drawdowns
PYCBX vs. PYCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYCBX drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, which is greater than PYCRX's maximum drawdown of -10.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYCBX and PYCRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYCBX | PYCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.59% | -10.80% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.97% | -3.83% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.59% | -10.80% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.59% | -10.80% | -7.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -2.55% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -1.42% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.08% | -0.13% |
Volatility
PYCBX vs. PYCRX - Volatility Comparison
Payden Core Bond Fund (PYCBX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund (PYCRX) at 0.97%. This indicates that PYCBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PYCBX | PYCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 0.97% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 1.65% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.51% | 4.29% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.70% | 3.28% | +2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.67% | 3.23% | +1.44% |