PXSGX vs. CMCIX
PXSGX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, PXSGX returned -17.21% vs 4.45% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXSGX charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXSGX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than CMCIX's 10.03% return.
PXSGX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- 9.38%
- 6M
- -7.00%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- -17.21%
- 3Y*
- -1.91%
- 5Y*
- -4.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
CMCIX
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -0.23% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 4.09% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 10.03% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXSGX and CMCIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between PXSGX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXSGX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
PXSGX
CMCIX
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.07 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 0.48 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 1.11 | -2.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXSGX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXSGX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.72% | -21.50% | -32.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.07% | -11.68% | -16.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.17% | -3.50% | -30.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.91% | -6.45% | -5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.29% | 5.03% | +12.26% |
Volatility
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 4.06%. This indicates that PXSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 4.06% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.41% | 10.96% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 15.33% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 16.46% | +8.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 16.46% | +6.13% |
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXSGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
PXSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.02%, more than CMCIX's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 3.86% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 48.02% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXSGX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXSGX has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to CMCIX (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXSGX dropped -53.72% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
CMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXSGX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer