PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXSGX vs. CMCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXSGX achieves a -9.83% return, which is significantly lower than CMCIX's 2.70% return.


PXSGX

1D
-1.45%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-9.83%
6M
-10.79%
1Y
-24.86%
3Y*
-2.19%
5Y*
-5.38%
10Y*
9.83%

CMCIX

1D
0.04%
1M
0.20%
YTD
2.70%
6M
1.11%
1Y
0.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PXSGX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund
-9.83%-22.97%21.11%4.28%
CMCIX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I
2.70%-5.28%10.46%7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PXSGX and CMCIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

0.86

The correlation between PXSGX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXSGX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXSGX
PXSGX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
PXSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
PXSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCIX
CMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXSGXCMCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.01

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

-0.02

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.54

-0.05

-1.49

PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXSGX Sharpe Ratio is -1.33, which is lower than the CMCIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXSGX and CMCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXSGXCMCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.33

-0.02

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.34

+0.06

Drawdowns

PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXSGX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXSGX and CMCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXSGXCMCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.72%

-21.50%

-32.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.37%

-11.68%

-16.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.51%

-9.93%

-30.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-6.45%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.92%

4.99%

+10.93%

Volatility

PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.71%. This indicates that PXSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXSGXCMCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

3.71%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

10.57%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.57%

15.15%

+3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.78%

16.53%

+8.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.58%

16.53%

+6.05%

PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXSGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison

PXSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.13%, more than CMCIX's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMCIX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I
4.14%4.25%7.13%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXSGX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund
53.13%47.91%20.72%5.31%17.32%14.31%9.64%1.52%2.31%0.00%2.69%2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXSGX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXSGX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to CMCIX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXSGX dropped -53.72% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.

CMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXSGX and CMCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer