PXSGX vs. CMCIX
PXSGX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, PXSGX returned -24.86% vs 0.03% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXSGX charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXSGX achieves a -9.83% return, which is significantly lower than CMCIX's 2.70% return.
PXSGX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -9.83%
- 6M
- -10.79%
- 1Y
- -24.86%
- 3Y*
- -2.19%
- 5Y*
- -5.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
CMCIX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 0.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -9.83% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 4.28% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 2.70% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXSGX and CMCIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between PXSGX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXSGX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
PXSGX
CMCIX
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.01 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.02 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | -0.05 | -1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.33 | -0.02 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.34 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXSGX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXSGX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.72% | -21.50% | -32.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.37% | -11.68% | -16.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.51% | -9.93% | -30.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -6.45% | -5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.92% | 4.99% | +10.93% |
Volatility
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.71%. This indicates that PXSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 3.71% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.18% | 10.57% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.57% | 15.15% | +3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 16.53% | +8.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 16.53% | +6.05% |
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXSGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXSGX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
PXSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.13%, more than CMCIX's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.14% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 53.13% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXSGX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXSGX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to CMCIX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXSGX dropped -53.72% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
CMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXSGX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer