PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXQSX vs. VIMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXQSX achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than VIMCX's -1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PXQSX has underperformed VIMCX with an annualized return of 7.49%, while VIMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.43% annualized return.


PXQSX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.66%
1Y
-1.70%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
-0.34%
10Y*
7.49%

VIMCX

1D
0.14%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
-1.15%
6M
-1.27%
1Y
-1.37%
3Y*
6.66%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
10.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXQSX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund
1.48%-4.50%9.63%19.10%-24.29%19.50%28.16%24.87%-15.95%18.90%
VIMCX
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund
-1.15%0.72%5.20%22.64%-19.75%25.28%26.11%31.74%-4.18%24.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PXQSX and VIMCX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2009

0.88

The correlation between PXQSX and VIMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXQSX vs. VIMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXQSX
PXQSX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
PXQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PXQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

VIMCX
VIMCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VIMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VIMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXQSXVIMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.00

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

-0.07

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

-0.18

+0.10

PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXQSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is higher than the VIMCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXQSX and VIMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXQSXVIMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

-0.05

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.14

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.56

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.71

-0.36

Drawdowns

PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXQSX drawdown since its inception was -55.56%, which is greater than VIMCX's maximum drawdown of -33.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQSX and VIMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXQSXVIMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.56%

-33.92%

-21.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.25%

-12.14%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-20.32%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-28.42%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.65%

-33.92%

-3.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.79%

-7.60%

-5.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-4.88%

-5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.24%

4.56%

+1.68%

Volatility

PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) at 4.14%. This indicates that PXQSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXQSXVIMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.14%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

12.04%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.75%

15.68%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.22%

18.11%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.51%

18.70%

+1.81%

PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXQSX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than VIMCX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Dividend Comparison

PXQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than VIMCX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXQSX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund
5.73%5.81%4.90%2.99%3.37%1.76%0.82%0.80%2.54%5.32%8.89%7.58%
VIMCX
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund
4.47%4.41%0.00%2.36%0.23%1.58%0.67%0.94%0.77%0.29%0.00%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXQSX and VIMCX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXQSX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to VIMCX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQSX dropped -55.56% vs VIMCX's -33.92%.

PXQSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXQSX and VIMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer