PXQSX vs. VIMCX
PXQSX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund) and VIMCX (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund) are both mutual funds - PXQSX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus, while VIMCX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus. Over the past 10 years, PXQSX returned 8.24%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for VIMCX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXQSX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for VIMCX.
Performance
PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXQSX achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly higher than VIMCX's -1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PXQSX has underperformed VIMCX with an annualized return of 8.24%, while VIMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.
PXQSX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 1.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
VIMCX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -3.42%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQSX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund | 5.69% | -4.50% | 9.63% | 19.10% | -24.29% | 19.50% | 28.16% | 24.87% | -15.95% | 18.90% |
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | -1.53% | 0.72% | 5.20% | 22.64% | -19.75% | 25.28% | 26.11% | 31.74% | -4.18% | 24.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXQSX and VIMCX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.88 |
The correlation between PXQSX and VIMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXQSX vs. VIMCX — Risk / Return Rank
PXQSX
VIMCX
PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXQSX | VIMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.00 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.13 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | -0.33 | +0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXQSX drawdown since its inception was -55.56%, which is greater than VIMCX's maximum drawdown of -33.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQSX and VIMCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXQSX | VIMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.56% | -33.92% | -21.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.25% | -12.14% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.87% | -20.32% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | -28.42% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.65% | -33.92% | -3.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.17% | -7.95% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -4.89% | -5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.48% | 4.78% | +1.70% |
Volatility
PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) is 4.34%, while Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that PXQSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXQSX | VIMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 5.50% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 12.72% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.95% | 16.29% | +0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 18.21% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 18.69% | +1.81% |
PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXQSX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than VIMCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXQSX vs. VIMCX - Dividend Comparison
PXQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than VIMCX's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQSX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund | 5.50% | 5.81% | 4.90% | 2.99% | 3.37% | 1.76% | 0.82% | 0.80% | 2.54% | 5.32% | 8.89% | 7.58% |
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | 4.48% | 4.41% | 0.00% | 2.36% | 0.23% | 1.58% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 0.77% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXQSX and VIMCX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIMCX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to PXQSX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQSX dropped -55.56% vs VIMCX's -33.92%.
PXQSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXQSX and VIMCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer