PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXNIX vs. YFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXNIX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pax International Sustainable Economy Fund Institutional Class (PXNIX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXNIX achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 22.44% return.


PXNIX

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.53%
YTD
9.01%
6M
8.39%
1Y
20.88%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
9.62%

YFSIX

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
22.44%
6M
24.75%
1Y
22.66%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXNIX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXNIX
Pax International Sustainable Economy Fund Institutional Class
9.01%28.91%5.03%19.28%-17.81%11.23%10.79%23.03%-12.92%19.75%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
22.44%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PXNIX and YFSIX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between PXNIX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXNIX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXNIX
PXNIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PXNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PXNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXNIX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax International Sustainable Economy Fund Institutional Class (PXNIX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXNIXYFSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.56

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.24

4.85

+2.39

PXNIX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXNIX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXNIX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXNIX drawdown since its inception was -32.54%, smaller than the maximum YFSIX drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXNIX and YFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXNIXYFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.54%

-35.10%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.58%

-14.20%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-14.20%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.54%

-25.14%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-4.53%

+3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.68%

-4.89%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

4.54%

-1.53%

Volatility

PXNIX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pax International Sustainable Economy Fund Institutional Class (PXNIX) is 4.95%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that PXNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXNIXYFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

6.69%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

21.43%

-8.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

21.93%

-5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

15.56%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

16.30%

+0.22%

PXNIX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXNIX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXNIX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

PXNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXNIX
Pax International Sustainable Economy Fund Institutional Class
5.12%7.17%3.54%2.38%2.64%4.69%1.82%2.58%2.84%2.54%2.74%2.04%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXNIX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSIX has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to PXNIX (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXNIX dropped -32.54% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

PXNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXNIX and YFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer