PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXE vs. AVSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXE vs. AVSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXE achieves a 30.28% return, which is significantly higher than AVSF's 0.61% return.


PXE

1D
0.19%
1M
0.68%
6M
28.67%
YTD
30.28%
1Y
25.96%
3Y*
11.99%
5Y*
20.19%
10Y*
8.82%

AVSF

1D
0.16%
1M
0.02%
6M
0.55%
YTD
0.61%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXE vs. AVSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PXE
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF
30.28%-2.82%-1.86%7.69%58.32%94.04%29.41%
AVSF
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF
0.61%6.57%3.81%5.25%-5.52%-1.17%0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PXE and AVSF is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020

-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PXE and AVSF has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXE vs. AVSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXE
PXE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

AVSF
AVSF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AVSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVSF Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
AVSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXE vs. AVSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXEAVSFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.51

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.73

9.03

-5.30

PXE vs. AVSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXE Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the AVSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXE and AVSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXE vs. AVSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXE drawdown since its inception was -83.99%, which is greater than AVSF's maximum drawdown of -8.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXE and AVSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXEAVSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.99%

-8.85%

-75.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.70%

-1.42%

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.65%

-1.42%

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.65%

-8.85%

-28.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.89%

-0.37%

-9.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.91%

-2.17%

-25.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.99%

0.39%

+6.60%

Volatility

PXE vs. AVSF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF) at 0.65%. This indicates that PXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXEAVSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.80%

0.65%

+7.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.21%

1.48%

+19.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.75%

1.93%

+25.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.47%

2.67%

+30.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.95%

2.52%

+34.43%

PXE vs. AVSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXE has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than AVSF's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXE vs. AVSF - Dividend Comparison

PXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than AVSF's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVSF
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF
4.37%4.31%4.34%3.93%1.78%0.48%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXE
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF
1.83%2.98%2.54%2.78%3.03%1.86%4.10%1.70%1.29%1.54%6.62%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXE and AVSF have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXE has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to AVSF (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXE dropped -83.99% vs AVSF's -8.85%.

On 5-year performance, PXE leads with 20.19% vs 1.87% for AVSF. On fees, AVSF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVSF has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PXE has performed better with a 20.19% return vs 1.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVSF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXE.

AVSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 1.83% for PXE.

PXE is categorized as Energy Equities, while AVSF is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXE and 0.15% for AVSF.

AVSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXE and AVSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer