PXE vs. AVGB
PXE (Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF) and AVGB (Avantis Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production Intellidex Index, while AVGB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Avantis. PXE is passively managed, while AVGB is actively managed. Over the past year, PXE returned 40.52% vs 4.50% for AVGB. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. PXE charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for AVGB.
Performance
PXE vs. AVGB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXE achieves a 33.42% return, which is significantly higher than AVGB's 0.84% return.
PXE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -4.54%
- YTD
- 33.42%
- 6M
- 22.41%
- 1Y
- 40.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 18.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.45%
AVGB
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXE vs. AVGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PXE Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF | 33.42% | 14.71% |
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF | 0.84% | 4.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXE and AVGB is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXE vs. AVGB — Risk / Return Rank
PXE
AVGB
PXE vs. AVGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXE | AVGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.13 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 7.95 | -0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXE | AVGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.83 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 2.06 | -1.89 |
Drawdowns
PXE vs. AVGB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXE drawdown since its inception was -83.99%, which is greater than AVGB's maximum drawdown of -2.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXE and AVGB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXE | AVGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.99% | -2.12% | -81.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -2.12% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -0.37% | -7.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.99% | -0.33% | -27.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.74% | 0.57% | +5.17% |
Volatility
PXE vs. AVGB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) has a higher volatility of 9.57% compared to Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) at 0.84%. This indicates that PXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXE | AVGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.57% | 0.84% | +8.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.70% | 1.91% | +18.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.44% | 2.48% | +24.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.66% | 2.48% | +31.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.98% | 2.48% | +34.50% |
PXE vs. AVGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXE has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGB's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXE vs. AVGB - Dividend Comparison
PXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than AVGB's 3.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF | 3.46% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXE Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF | 2.00% | 2.98% | 2.54% | 2.78% | 3.03% | 1.86% | 4.10% | 1.70% | 1.29% | 1.54% | 6.62% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXE and AVGB have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXE has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to AVGB (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXE dropped -83.99% vs AVGB's -2.12%.
On 1-year performance, PXE leads with 40.52% vs 4.50% for AVGB. On fees, AVGB is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AVGB has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PXE has performed better with a 40.52% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVGB is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXE.
AVGB has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 2.00% for PXE.
PXE is categorized as Energy Equities, while AVGB is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXE and 0.19% for AVGB.
AVGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXE and AVGB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer