PWRZ vs. OIH

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) and OIH (VanEck Oil Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. PWRZ is actively managed, while OIH is passively managed. PWRZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for OIH.

Performance

PWRZ vs. OIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PWRZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OIH

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -10.99%
• 6M: 18.45%
• YTD: 31.51%
• 1Y: 53.67%
• 3Y*: 8.30%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: -2.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRZ vs. OIH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	0.00%
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF	-0.88%

Return for Risk

PWRZ vs. OIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWRZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OIH

OIH Risk / Return Rank: 66
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 61
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWRZ vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PWRZ	OIH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.79	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.42	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.60	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.31	—

Drawdowns

PWRZ vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRZ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum OIH drawdown of -94.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRZ and OIH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWRZ	OIH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-94.45%	+94.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.78%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-43.80%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.80%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-66.65%	+66.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-48.90%	+48.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.78%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PWRZ	OIH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	30.08%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	36.65%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	42.33%	—

PWRZ vs. OIH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWRZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OIH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWRZ vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison

PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF	1.30%	1.71%	2.01%	1.36%	0.95%	0.98%	1.23%	2.10%	2.13%	2.60%	1.40%	2.39%
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PWRZ or OIH?

On fees, OIH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWRZ or OIH?

OIH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWRZ or OIH?

OIH has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.

What is the main difference between PWRZ and OIH?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRZ and 0.35% for OIH.