PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWRIX vs. FLOTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWRIX vs. FLOTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Donoghue Forlines Tactical Income Fund (PWRIX) and Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWRIX achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly higher than FLOTX's -0.55% return.


PWRIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
-0.25%
6M
-0.14%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
1.69%

FLOTX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.33%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
0.09%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRIX vs. FLOTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PWRIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Income Fund
-0.25%3.58%4.57%8.09%-9.39%3.11%-4.54%9.07%-0.96%
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
-0.55%2.47%6.76%8.28%-3.59%2.45%3.95%3.51%1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PWRIX and FLOTX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018

0.44

The correlation between PWRIX and FLOTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWRIX vs. FLOTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWRIX
PWRIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PWRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PWRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOTX
FLOTX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FLOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWRIX vs. FLOTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Donoghue Forlines Tactical Income Fund (PWRIX) and Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWRIXFLOTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

2.01

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

2.92

-1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.46

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.41

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.20

3.82

-0.62

PWRIX vs. FLOTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the FLOTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWRIX and FLOTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWRIXFLOTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

2.01

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

1.01

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.24

-0.74

Drawdowns

PWRIX vs. FLOTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRIX drawdown since its inception was -14.55%, which is greater than FLOTX's maximum drawdown of -4.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRIX and FLOTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWRIXFLOTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.55%

-4.40%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.09%

-2.36%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.92%

-3.34%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.43%

-4.40%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.97%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-1.03%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.87%

-0.17%

Volatility

PWRIX vs. FLOTX - Volatility Comparison

Donoghue Forlines Tactical Income Fund (PWRIX) has a higher volatility of 0.86% compared to Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX) at 0.43%. This indicates that PWRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWRIXFLOTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

0.43%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.88%

1.34%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09%

1.67%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

2.68%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.55%

2.46%

+2.09%

PWRIX vs. FLOTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWRIX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOTX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWRIX vs. FLOTX - Dividend Comparison

PWRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than FLOTX's 6.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
6.80%5.79%7.15%7.16%1.56%2.13%2.42%3.78%3.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWRIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Income Fund
3.60%2.17%4.85%3.78%0.41%2.88%1.14%1.79%3.99%3.91%0.66%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWRIX and FLOTX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWRIX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to FLOTX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWRIX dropped -14.55% vs FLOTX's -4.40%.

FLOTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWRIX and FLOTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer