PUSH vs. PMAP

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

PUSH (PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF) and PMAP (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - PUSH is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM, while PMAP is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PUSH returned 3.48% vs 6.61% for PMAP. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PUSH charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMAP.

Performance

PUSH vs. PMAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUSH achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than PMAP's 3.66% return.

PUSH

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 1.45%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 1Y: 3.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PMAP

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: 3.43%
• YTD: 3.66%
• 1Y: 6.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUSH vs. PMAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	1.66%	3.04%
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April	3.66%	5.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PUSH and PMAP is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

PUSH vs. PMAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUSH

PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 93
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 96
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 92

PMAP

PMAP Risk / Return Rank: 99
PMAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUSH vs. PMAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PUSH	PMAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	5.75	-3.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	11.38	-7.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	2.61	-0.99
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.97	19.04	-12.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.28	94.01	-76.73

PUSH vs. PMAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is lower than the PMAP Sharpe Ratio of 5.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUSH and PMAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PUSH vs. PMAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUSH drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, smaller than the maximum PMAP drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUSH and PMAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PUSH	PMAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.85%	-1.75%	+0.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.50%	-0.35%	-0.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-0.08%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	0.07%	+0.13%

Volatility

PUSH vs. PMAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) is 0.27%, while PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP) has a volatility of 0.32%. This indicates that PUSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PUSH	PMAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.27%	0.32%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.00%	0.90%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52%	1.15%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.28%	2.26%	-0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.28%	2.26%	-0.98%

PUSH vs. PMAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUSH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PMAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PUSH vs. PMAP - Dividend Comparison

PUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, while PMAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	3.21%	3.45%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PUSH and PMAP in my portfolio?

PUSH and PMAP have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PUSH or PMAP?

PMAP has higher volatility (0.32%) compared to PUSH (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUSH dropped -0.85% vs PMAP's -1.75%.

Which ETF is better, PUSH or PMAP?

On 1-year performance, PMAP leads with 6.61% vs 3.48% for PUSH. On fees, PUSH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PUSH or PMAP?

Over the 1-year period, PMAP has performed better with a 6.61% return vs 3.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PUSH or PMAP?

PUSH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PUSH or PMAP?

PUSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 0.00% for PMAP.

What is the main difference between PUSH and PMAP?

PUSH is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PMAP is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PUSH and 0.50% for PMAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.75 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.