PUSH vs. DBO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PUSH (PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PUSH is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. PUSH is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, PUSH returned 3.05% vs 60.30% for DBO. Their -0.13 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PUSH charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

PUSH vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUSH achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return.

PUSH

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.02%
• 6M: 1.03%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 1Y: 3.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.58%

DBO

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 24.59%
• 6M: 53.46%
• YTD: 76.48%
• 1Y: 60.30%
• 3Y*: 14.86%
• 5Y*: 13.46%
• 10Y*: 12.59%
• ALL TIME*: 0.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	$11.01M	$10.23M	$13.95M
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	$1.06M	$1.02M	$945.33K

PUSH vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	1.56%	4.16%	1.74%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	76.48%	-11.71%	-5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PUSH and DBO is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024	-0.13

Return for Risk

PUSH vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PUSH

PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 93
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 96
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 92

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 58
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PUSH vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PUSH	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.45	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	2.05	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.25	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.59	2.01	+4.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.23	6.09	+10.14

PUSH vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUSH and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PUSH vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUSH drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUSH and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PUSH	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.85%	-90.18%	+89.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.50%	-27.73%	+27.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-53.56%	+53.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-62.20%	+62.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	9.96%	-9.76%

Volatility

PUSH vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) is 0.25%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that PUSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PUSH	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.25%	17.75%	-17.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.62%	33.77%	-33.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52%	38.53%	-37.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.27%	33.35%	-32.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.27%	32.20%	-30.93%

PUSH vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUSH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

PUSH vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

PUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than DBO's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	1.99%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	3.17%	3.45%	1.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PUSH and DBO in my portfolio?

PUSH and DBO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PUSH or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to PUSH (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUSH dropped -0.85% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, PUSH or DBO?

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 60.30% vs 3.05% for PUSH. On fees, PUSH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PUSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PUSH or DBO?

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 60.30% return vs 3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PUSH or DBO?

PUSH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PUSH or DBO?

PUSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 1.99% for DBO.

What is the main difference between PUSH and DBO?

PUSH is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PUSH and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.