PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PURZX vs. FSRNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PURZX vs. FSRNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Global Real Estate Fund (PURZX) and Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PURZX achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly higher than FSRNX's 7.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PURZX having a 4.15% annualized return and FSRNX not far behind at 3.98%.


PURZX

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
8.43%
6M
7.58%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
4.15%

FSRNX

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
7.68%
6M
6.60%
1Y
9.92%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
2.15%
10Y*
3.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PURZX vs. FSRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PURZX
PGIM Global Real Estate Fund
8.43%9.22%3.64%11.24%-26.73%27.91%-4.39%20.60%-5.32%10.36%
FSRNX
Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund
7.68%3.03%4.99%11.93%-26.14%40.66%-11.31%23.78%-4.91%3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PURZX and FSRNX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011

0.90

The correlation between PURZX and FSRNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PURZX vs. FSRNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PURZX
PURZX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PURZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PURZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PURZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PURZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PURZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRNX
FSRNX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FSRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PURZX vs. FSRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global Real Estate Fund (PURZX) and Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PURZXFSRNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.13

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

1.14

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.46

3.63

+0.84

PURZX vs. FSRNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PURZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the FSRNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PURZX and FSRNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PURZXFSRNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.73

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.11

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.19

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.34

+0.03

Drawdowns

PURZX vs. FSRNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PURZX drawdown since its inception was -69.49%, which is greater than FSRNX's maximum drawdown of -44.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PURZX and FSRNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PURZXFSRNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.49%

-44.26%

-25.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-8.47%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.57%

-17.49%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.80%

-34.27%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.05%

-44.26%

+3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.95%

-3.70%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.98%

-9.69%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.67%

+0.05%

Volatility

PURZX vs. FSRNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Global Real Estate Fund (PURZX) is 3.60%, while Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that PURZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PURZXFSRNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

3.79%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

9.42%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

13.22%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

18.89%

-2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

21.40%

-4.12%

PURZX vs. FSRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PURZX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRNX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

PURZX vs. FSRNX - Dividend Comparison

PURZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than FSRNX's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRNX
Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund
2.58%2.77%2.86%2.84%2.66%1.25%3.33%4.52%3.62%2.27%3.40%2.57%
PURZX
PGIM Global Real Estate Fund
2.76%2.85%2.68%2.27%2.22%16.92%1.71%10.18%4.22%3.93%4.67%3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PURZX and FSRNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSRNX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to PURZX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PURZX dropped -69.49% vs FSRNX's -44.26%.

PURZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PURZX and FSRNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer