PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PURZX vs. DLDRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PURZX vs. DLDRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Global Real Estate Fund (PURZX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PURZX achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than DLDRX's 27.78% return. Over the past 10 years, PURZX has underperformed DLDRX with an annualized return of 4.15%, while DLDRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.27% annualized return.


PURZX

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
8.43%
6M
7.58%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
4.15%

DLDRX

1D
1.80%
1M
2.82%
YTD
27.78%
6M
30.19%
1Y
54.55%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PURZX vs. DLDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PURZX
PGIM Global Real Estate Fund
8.43%9.22%3.64%11.24%-26.73%27.91%-4.39%20.60%-5.32%10.36%
DLDRX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund
27.78%15.04%0.81%1.58%34.18%38.30%6.58%16.64%-17.57%14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PURZX and DLDRX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.52

The correlation between PURZX and DLDRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PURZX vs. DLDRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PURZX
PURZX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PURZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PURZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PURZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PURZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PURZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

DLDRX
DLDRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DLDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DLDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PURZX vs. DLDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global Real Estate Fund (PURZX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PURZXDLDRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.51

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

7.52

-6.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.46

23.70

-19.24

PURZX vs. DLDRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PURZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the DLDRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PURZX and DLDRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PURZXDLDRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

3.11

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.64

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.56

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.40

-0.03

Drawdowns

PURZX vs. DLDRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PURZX drawdown since its inception was -69.49%, roughly equal to the maximum DLDRX drawdown of -69.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PURZX and DLDRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PURZXDLDRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.49%

-69.13%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-7.49%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.57%

-32.44%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.80%

-32.44%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.05%

-54.24%

+13.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.95%

0.00%

-3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.98%

-20.77%

+8.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.37%

+0.35%

Volatility

PURZX vs. DLDRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Global Real Estate Fund (PURZX) is 3.60%, while BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that PURZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLDRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PURZXDLDRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.59%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

13.47%

-4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

18.14%

-6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

25.65%

-9.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

25.49%

-8.21%

PURZX vs. DLDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PURZX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than DLDRX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

PURZX vs. DLDRX - Dividend Comparison

PURZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than DLDRX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLDRX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund
1.83%2.33%7.45%12.42%9.66%5.07%1.11%2.16%1.87%0.63%1.44%1.25%
PURZX
PGIM Global Real Estate Fund
2.76%2.85%2.68%2.27%2.22%16.92%1.71%10.18%4.22%3.93%4.67%3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


PURZX and DLDRX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLDRX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to PURZX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PURZX dropped -69.49% vs DLDRX's -69.13%.

DLDRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PURZX and DLDRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer