PULT vs. SPTU
PULT (Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. PULT is actively managed, while SPTU is passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PULT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
PULT vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PULT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PULT vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF | 1.23% | 1.05% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.90% | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PULT and SPTU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PULT vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PULT vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PULT | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.00% | — |
Volatility
PULT vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PULT | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.32% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 0.32% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 0.32% | — |
PULT vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
PULT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PULT vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
PULT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF | 3.89% | 4.59% | 5.38% | 4.88% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.66% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PULT and SPTU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PULT.
PULT has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 2.66% for SPTU.
They also come from different issuers: Putnam and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PULT and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for PULT and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer