PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUI vs. SPVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUI vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUI achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than SPVM's 15.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PUI has underperformed SPVM with an annualized return of 7.81%, while SPVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.


PUI

1D
-0.27%
1M
-4.01%
6M
2.49%
YTD
5.60%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
7.81%
ALL TIME*
8.18%

SPVM

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.32%
6M
11.82%
YTD
15.18%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
12.30%
ALL TIME*
12.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$210.08K$1.19M$591.02K
$1.04M$1.14M$1.20M

PUI vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUI
Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF
5.60%15.25%23.91%-4.47%-2.17%15.02%-5.05%20.95%6.12%11.85%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
15.18%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%29.33%-9.17%14.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PUI and SPVM is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2011

0.48

The correlation between PUI and SPVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PUI vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PUI
SPVM

Utilities

88.7%
13.4%

Energy

8.7%
11.8%

Industrials

2.4%
9.4%

Communication Services

1.7%
2.7%

Financial Services

0.1%
36.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Real Estate

-

2.1%

Technology

-

6.2%

Utilities

PUI
88.7%
SPVM
13.4%

Energy

PUI
8.7%
SPVM
11.8%

Industrials

PUI
2.4%
SPVM
9.4%

Communication Services

PUI
1.7%
SPVM
2.7%

Financial Services

PUI
0.1%
SPVM
36.8%

Basic Materials

PUI

-

SPVM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PUI

-

SPVM
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

PUI

-

SPVM
4.7%

Healthcare

PUI

-

SPVM
8.6%

Real Estate

PUI

-

SPVM
2.1%

Technology

PUI

-

SPVM
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUI vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PUI
PUI Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PUI vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PUISPVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.45

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

4.47

-4.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.95

17.23

-16.27

PUI vs. SPVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUI Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the SPVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUI and SPVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PUI vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUI drawdown since its inception was -43.20%, roughly equal to the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUI and SPVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUISPVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.20%

-45.35%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-6.57%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.35%

-18.66%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-19.48%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-45.35%

+9.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.95%

-1.34%

-4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-4.94%

-3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.98%

1.70%

+3.28%

Volatility

PUI vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 3.18%. This indicates that PUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUISPVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.18%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

7.72%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.10%

11.40%

+3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

16.57%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.09%

19.51%

-0.42%

PUI vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

PUI vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison

PUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than SPVM's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PUI
Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF
2.05%2.22%2.06%2.36%2.16%2.03%2.42%2.02%1.87%2.98%3.35%2.82%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
1.92%2.02%1.91%2.45%2.33%1.41%2.11%2.40%3.10%1.68%2.80%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUI and SPVM have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PUI has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to SPVM (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUI dropped -43.20% vs SPVM's -45.35%.

On 10-year performance, SPVM leads with 12.30% vs 7.81% for PUI. On fees, SPVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPVM has performed better with a 12.30% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PUI.

PUI has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.92% for SPVM.

PUI tracks DWA Utilities Technical Leaders Index, while SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PUI and 0.39% for SPVM.

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUI and SPVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer