PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUI vs. MTUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUI vs. MTUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUI achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly lower than MTUL's 60.22% return.


PUI

1D
-0.49%
1M
-4.33%
YTD
6.30%
6M
3.12%
1Y
11.74%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
8.33%

MTUL

1D
-0.74%
1M
27.97%
YTD
60.22%
6M
59.66%
1Y
75.85%
3Y*
59.49%
5Y*
19.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUI vs. MTUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PUI
Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF
6.30%15.25%23.91%-4.47%-2.17%13.52%
MTUL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN
60.22%27.42%58.70%10.66%-37.97%7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PUI and MTUL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUI vs. MTUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUI
PUI Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUI Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUI Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUL
MTUL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MTUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUI vs. MTUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PUIMTULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.32

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

3.20

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

12.78

-10.31

PUI vs. MTUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUI Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the MTUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUI and MTUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PUIMTULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

1.73

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.47

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.41

+0.04

Drawdowns

PUI vs. MTUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUI drawdown since its inception was -43.20%, smaller than the maximum MTUL drawdown of -56.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUI and MTUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUIMTULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.20%

-56.83%

+13.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-23.86%

+12.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.28%

-39.15%

+23.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-56.83%

+33.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-0.74%

-4.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-22.68%

+14.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

5.96%

-1.20%

Volatility

PUI vs. MTUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) is 5.31%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) has a volatility of 20.29%. This indicates that PUI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUIMTULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

20.29%

-14.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

37.63%

-26.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

43.98%

-29.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

42.81%

-26.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

43.65%

-24.58%

PUI vs. MTUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PUI vs. MTUL - Dividend Comparison

PUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while MTUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PUI
Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF
2.11%2.22%2.06%2.36%2.16%2.03%2.42%2.02%1.87%2.98%3.35%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUI and MTUL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUL has higher volatility (20.29%) compared to PUI (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUI dropped -43.20% vs MTUL's -56.83%.

On 5-year performance, MTUL leads with 19.95% vs 8.55% for PUI. On fees, PUI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PUI has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MTUL has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PUI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MTUL.

PUI has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.00% for MTUL.

PUI tracks DWA Utilities Technical Leaders Index, while MTUL tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PUI and 0.95% for MTUL.

MTUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUI and MTUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer