PUCZX vs. FIWDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PUCZX (PGIM Strategic Bond Fund Class Z) and FIWDX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z) are both Total Bond Market funds. Over the past 5 years, PUCZX returned 1.72%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for FIWDX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PUCZX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FIWDX.

Performance

PUCZX vs. FIWDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Strategic Bond Fund Class Z (PUCZX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUCZX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than FIWDX's 3.40% return.

PUCZX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: 1.03%
• 1Y: 5.63%
• 3Y*: 7.16%
• 5Y*: 1.72%
• 10Y*: 4.33%

FIWDX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 6M: 3.72%
• 1Y: 9.32%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: 3.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUCZX vs. FIWDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PUCZX PGIM Strategic Bond Fund Class Z	0.48%	8.47%	6.46%	8.20%	-13.74%	0.05%	6.28%	14.89%	-1.47%
FIWDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z	3.40%	8.98%	6.07%	9.20%	-11.76%	3.51%	7.60%	11.20%	-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PUCZX and FIWDX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.82

The correlation between PUCZX and FIWDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PUCZX vs. FIWDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUCZX

PUCZX Risk / Return Rank: 34
PUCZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PUCZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PUCZX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PUCZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
PUCZX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FIWDX

FIWDX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FIWDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FIWDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FIWDX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FIWDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FIWDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUCZX vs. FIWDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Strategic Bond Fund Class Z (PUCZX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PUCZX	FIWDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.60	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	3.96	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.55	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	3.65	-1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	15.56	-8.87

PUCZX vs. FIWDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUCZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the FIWDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUCZX and FIWDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PUCZX vs. FIWDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUCZX drawdown since its inception was -18.60%, which is greater than FIWDX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUCZX and FIWDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PUCZX	FIWDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.60%	-15.96%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.11%	-2.61%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.58%	-3.97%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.60%	-15.96%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.26%	-0.08%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-3.18%	-0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.61%	+0.27%

Volatility

PUCZX vs. FIWDX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Strategic Bond Fund Class Z (PUCZX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX) have volatilities of 1.47% and 1.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PUCZX	FIWDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.47%	1.40%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.02%	3.13%	-0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.74%	3.68%	+0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.66%	4.57%	+0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.72%	4.88%	-0.16%

PUCZX vs. FIWDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUCZX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FIWDX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

PUCZX vs. FIWDX - Dividend Comparison

PUCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than FIWDX's 4.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FIWDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z	4.34%	4.39%	4.21%	4.02%	2.99%	4.28%	4.62%	4.39%	1.13%	0.00%	0.00%
PUCZX PGIM Strategic Bond Fund Class Z	5.16%	5.12%	6.40%	7.62%	5.17%	3.65%	5.06%	8.81%	4.56%	4.52%	6.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PUCZX and FIWDX in my portfolio?

PUCZX and FIWDX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PUCZX or FIWDX?

PUCZX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to FIWDX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUCZX dropped -18.60% vs FIWDX's -15.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIWDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.