PTY vs. PCLPX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PTY (PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund) and PCLPX (PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2) are both mutual funds - PTY is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by PIMCO, while PCLPX is a Commodities fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, PTY returned 8.40%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for PCLPX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTY charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for PCLPX.

Performance

PTY vs. PCLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTY achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than PCLPX's 32.20% return. Over the past 10 years, PTY has underperformed PCLPX with an annualized return of 8.40%, while PCLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.

PTY

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.91%
• 6M: -3.58%
• YTD: -1.50%
• 1Y: -3.88%
• 3Y*: 5.67%
• 5Y*: -0.13%
• 10Y*: 8.40%

PCLPX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 4.54%
• 6M: 28.01%
• YTD: 32.20%
• 1Y: 36.47%
• 3Y*: 13.50%
• 5Y*: 14.50%
• 10Y*: 11.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTY vs. PCLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PTY PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund	-1.50%	-0.51%	19.87%	22.56%	-18.71%	0.40%	3.24%	35.36%	2.49%	26.63%
PCLPX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2	32.20%	4.45%	5.92%	0.24%	23.04%	43.50%	-9.12%	19.39%	-12.15%	10.53%

Correlation

The correlation between PTY and PCLPX is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2010	0.14

The correlation between PTY and PCLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PTY vs. PCLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTY

PTY Risk / Return Rank: 2
PTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
PTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
PTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
PTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

PCLPX

PCLPX Risk / Return Rank: 61
PCLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
PCLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PCLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
PCLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
PCLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTY vs. PCLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTY	PCLPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	1.90	-2.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.40	2.52	-2.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.33	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.25	2.39	-2.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.46	8.34	-8.80

PTY vs. PCLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTY Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the PCLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTY and PCLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTY vs. PCLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTY drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, smaller than the maximum PCLPX drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTY and PCLPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTY	PCLPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.86%	-66.98%	+6.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.44%	-15.49%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.04%	-15.49%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.38%	-21.53%	-19.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.55%	-51.87%	+5.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.60%	-7.96%	-2.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.62%	-24.55%	+15.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.54%	4.42%	+4.12%

Volatility

PTY vs. PCLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) is 2.67%, while PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that PTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTY	PCLPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.67%	5.60%	-2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.60%	17.47%	-9.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.06%	19.45%	-8.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.25%	19.61%	-2.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.18%	40.58%	-19.40%

PTY vs. PCLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTY has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLPX's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTY vs. PCLPX - Dividend Comparison

PTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.00%, more than PCLPX's 10.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCLPX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2	10.70%	1.31%	5.22%	4.65%	43.16%	74.10%	0.71%	2.39%	18.62%	12.52%	0.15%	1.92%
PTY PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund	12.00%	11.05%	9.92%	10.77%	13.12%	9.16%	8.74%	8.37%	10.63%	9.48%	12.09%	11.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTY and PCLPX in my portfolio?

PTY and PCLPX have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTY or PCLPX?

PCLPX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to PTY (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTY dropped -60.86% vs PCLPX's -66.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.