PTTRX vs. EIBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund (EIBAX).
PTTRX is managed by PIMCO. EIBAX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Nov 17, 2009.
Performance
PTTRX vs. EIBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PTTRX vs. EIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTTRX PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class | -0.68% | 9.35% | 2.62% | 6.33% | -14.72% | -0.59% | 8.88% | 8.36% | -0.24% | 5.13% |
EIBAX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund | -0.62% | 9.15% | 4.38% | 5.59% | -12.88% | 3.02% | 5.89% | 10.84% | -0.84% | 7.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTTRX achieves a -0.68% return, which is significantly lower than EIBAX's -0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PTTRX has underperformed EIBAX with an annualized return of 2.27%, while EIBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.78% annualized return.
PTTRX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.81%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
EIBAX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.39%
- 10Y*
- 3.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PTTRX vs. EIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTTRX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than EIBAX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PTTRX vs. EIBAX — Risk / Return Rank
PTTRX
EIBAX
PTTRX vs. EIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund (EIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTTRX | EIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.27 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.84 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.84 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 6.68 | -1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTTRX | EIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.27 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.27 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.81 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.81 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between PTTRX and EIBAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PTTRX vs. EIBAX - Dividend Comparison
PTTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than EIBAX's 4.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTTRX PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class | 4.12% | 4.47% | 4.61% | 3.81% | 3.63% | 2.59% | 6.11% | 3.96% | 3.13% | 2.63% | 3.02% | 6.64% |
EIBAX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund | 4.76% | 5.13% | 5.58% | 4.01% | 4.04% | 3.49% | 3.87% | 3.97% | 4.16% | 3.55% | 3.90% | 5.69% |
Drawdowns
PTTRX vs. EIBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTTRX drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, which is greater than EIBAX's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTTRX and EIBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTTRX | EIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | -17.20% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.67% | -3.26% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.28% | -16.91% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.28% | -17.20% | -2.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -2.52% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.19% | -3.53% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 0.90% | +0.34% |
Volatility
PTTRX vs. EIBAX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund (EIBAX) at 1.69%. This indicates that PTTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PTTRX | EIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 1.69% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 2.70% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.15% | 4.33% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.20% | 5.26% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.19% | 4.69% | +0.50% |