PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTTPX vs. FYBTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTTPX vs. FYBTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 (PTTPX) and Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTTPX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than FYBTX's 0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, PTTPX has underperformed FYBTX with an annualized return of 1.85%, while FYBTX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.53% annualized return.


PTTPX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.37%
6M
-0.84%
YTD
-0.50%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
1.85%
ALL TIME*
3.43%

FYBTX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.20%
6M
0.60%
YTD
0.97%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*
2.53%
ALL TIME*
2.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PTTPX vs. FYBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTTPX
PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2
-0.50%9.24%2.51%5.47%-14.80%-0.70%8.78%8.26%-0.35%5.03%
FYBTX
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund
0.97%5.72%5.13%6.08%-3.50%-0.54%3.99%5.07%1.66%1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PTTPX and FYBTX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.72

The correlation between PTTPX and FYBTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTTPX vs. FYBTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTTPX
PTTPX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PTTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PTTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FYBTX
FYBTX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FYBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FYBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTTPX vs. FYBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 (PTTPX) and Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTTPXFYBTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.53

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

3.28

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

12.78

-9.57

PTTPX vs. FYBTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTTPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the FYBTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTTPX and FYBTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTTPX vs. FYBTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTTPX drawdown since its inception was -19.36%, which is greater than FYBTX's maximum drawdown of -6.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTTPX and FYBTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTTPXFYBTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.36%

-6.00%

-13.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.70%

-1.19%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.39%

-1.19%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.36%

-6.00%

-13.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.36%

-6.00%

-13.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

-0.30%

-2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-0.71%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

0.30%

+1.09%

Volatility

PTTPX vs. FYBTX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2 (PTTPX) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX) at 0.41%. This indicates that PTTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTTPXFYBTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.41%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.76%

1.40%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.58%

1.88%

+2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.28%

2.20%

+4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.22%

1.92%

+3.30%

PTTPX vs. FYBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTTPX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FYBTX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTTPX vs. FYBTX - Dividend Comparison

PTTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than FYBTX's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYBTX
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund
4.37%4.66%3.67%2.76%1.26%1.65%2.31%2.72%2.45%1.59%1.24%0.00%
PTTPX
PIMCO Total Return Fund Class I-2
4.17%4.37%4.51%3.04%3.53%2.48%6.01%3.87%3.02%2.53%2.92%6.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTTPX and FYBTX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTTPX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to FYBTX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTTPX dropped -19.36% vs FYBTX's -6.00%.

FYBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTTPX and FYBTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer