PTSHX vs. PCN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PTSHX (PIMCO Short Term Fund) and PCN (PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - PTSHX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by PIMCO, while PCN is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, PTSHX returned 2.98%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for PCN. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTSHX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PCN.

Performance

PTSHX vs. PCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Short Term Fund (PTSHX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTSHX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than PCN's -3.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PTSHX has underperformed PCN with an annualized return of 2.98%, while PCN has yielded a comparatively higher 7.26% annualized return.

PTSHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 2.31%
• 1Y: 4.87%
• 3Y*: 5.72%
• 5Y*: 3.67%
• 10Y*: 2.98%

PCN

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: -3.06%
• 6M: -1.10%
• 1Y: 2.84%
• 3Y*: 7.52%
• 5Y*: 0.90%
• 10Y*: 7.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTSHX vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PTSHX PIMCO Short Term Fund	1.92%	4.88%	6.43%	6.09%	-0.55%	0.02%	2.75%	2.74%	1.51%	2.43%
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	-3.06%	5.55%	19.52%	16.22%	-22.88%	6.93%	-2.19%	39.10%	-5.94%	26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PTSHX and PCN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2001	0.08

The correlation between PTSHX and PCN shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (10 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PTSHX vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTSHX

PTSHX Risk / Return Rank: 99
PTSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PTSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
PTSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PTSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
PTSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

PCN

PCN Risk / Return Rank: 4
PCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
PCN Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PCN Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTSHX vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Short Term Fund (PTSHX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTSHX	PCN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.42	0.29	+3.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	11.59	0.49	+11.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.89	1.07	+2.81
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	23.80	0.27	+23.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	77.18	0.80	+76.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTSHX vs. PCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTSHX Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is higher than the PCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTSHX and PCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTSHX	PCN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.42	0.29	+3.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.63	0.06	+2.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	2.22	0.33	+1.89
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.71	0.39	+1.32

Drawdowns

PTSHX vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTSHX drawdown since its inception was -5.12%, smaller than the maximum PCN drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTSHX and PCN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTSHX	PCN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	-61.12%	+56.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.21%	-10.40%	+10.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.41%	-22.53%	+22.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.33%	-33.39%	+31.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.79%	-50.27%	+45.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-5.59%	+5.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.19%	-7.20%	+7.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.06%	3.57%	-3.51%

Volatility

PTSHX vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Short Term Fund (PTSHX) is 0.39%, while PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that PTSHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTSHX	PCN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.39%	2.77%	-2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.97%	7.11%	-6.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44%	9.70%	-8.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.40%	16.19%	-14.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.35%	21.94%	-20.59%

PTSHX vs. PCN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTSHX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PCN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTSHX vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison

PTSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than PCN's 11.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	11.42%	10.58%	10.06%	10.88%	12.66%	7.89%	7.83%	7.37%	9.60%	7.85%	11.98%	10.22%
PTSHX PIMCO Short Term Fund	4.43%	4.75%	5.16%	4.51%	2.80%	0.63%	1.78%	2.92%	2.65%	1.69%	1.67%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTSHX and PCN in my portfolio?

PTSHX and PCN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTSHX or PCN?

PCN has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to PTSHX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTSHX dropped -5.12% vs PCN's -61.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.