PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTRQX vs. STYAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTRQX vs. STYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) and Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund (STYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTRQX achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly higher than STYAX's 0.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PTRQX having a 2.57% annualized return and STYAX not far behind at 2.46%.


PTRQX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.74%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
2.57%

STYAX

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.29%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
4.33%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTRQX vs. STYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTRQX
PGIM Total Return Bond R6
0.51%7.81%3.06%7.80%-14.30%-1.37%8.13%10.85%-0.73%6.67%
STYAX
Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund
0.18%7.03%2.05%6.45%-14.29%-0.16%11.30%9.11%-0.52%5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PTRQX and STYAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.89

The correlation between PTRQX and STYAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTRQX vs. STYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTRQX
PTRQX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PTRQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTRQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTRQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PTRQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTRQX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

STYAX
STYAX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
STYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
STYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
STYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
STYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTRQX vs. STYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) and Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund (STYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTRQXSTYAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.89

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

5.63

+0.37

PTRQX vs. STYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTRQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the STYAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTRQX and STYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTRQXSTYAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.43

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.02

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.53

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.00

-0.25

Drawdowns

PTRQX vs. STYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTRQX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, which is greater than STYAX's maximum drawdown of -18.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTRQX and STYAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTRQXSTYAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.72%

-18.83%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-2.83%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

-6.13%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.69%

-18.83%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.72%

-18.83%

-1.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-1.61%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-2.39%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.95%

+0.06%

Volatility

PTRQX vs. STYAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund (STYAX) at 1.41%. This indicates that PTRQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTRQXSTYAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

1.41%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

2.68%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26%

3.74%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

5.67%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.25%

4.69%

+0.56%

PTRQX vs. STYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTRQX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than STYAX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTRQX vs. STYAX - Dividend Comparison

PTRQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than STYAX's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTRQX
PGIM Total Return Bond R6
4.68%4.63%4.89%4.70%5.83%2.82%3.05%6.95%3.99%2.93%4.01%3.11%
STYAX
Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund
4.54%4.52%4.58%3.94%2.48%2.39%5.18%3.67%2.70%2.61%2.81%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PTRQX and STYAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PTRQX has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to STYAX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTRQX dropped -20.72% vs STYAX's -18.83%.

STYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTRQX and STYAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer