PTRQX vs. PRPZX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PTRQX (PGIM Total Return Bond R6) and PRPZX (PGIM Jennison MLP Fund) are both mutual funds - PTRQX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by PGIM, while PRPZX is a Energy Equities fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 10 years, PTRQX returned 2.58%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for PRPZX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. PTRQX charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for PRPZX.

Performance

PTRQX vs. PRPZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) and PGIM Jennison MLP Fund (PRPZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTRQX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than PRPZX's 21.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PTRQX has underperformed PRPZX with an annualized return of 2.58%, while PRPZX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.58% annualized return.

PTRQX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 0.60%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 6.44%
• 3Y*: 5.41%
• 5Y*: 0.90%
• 10Y*: 2.58%

PRPZX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: 21.25%
• 6M: 19.26%
• 1Y: 24.78%
• 3Y*: 24.09%
• 5Y*: 18.56%
• 10Y*: 9.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTRQX vs. PRPZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PTRQX PGIM Total Return Bond R6	0.60%	7.81%	3.06%	7.80%	-14.30%	-1.37%	8.13%	10.85%	-0.73%	6.67%
PRPZX PGIM Jennison MLP Fund	21.25%	7.33%	31.43%	13.07%	20.41%	40.49%	-24.05%	15.32%	-14.17%	-4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PTRQX and PRPZX is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2013	-0.05

The correlation between PTRQX and PRPZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.04 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PTRQX vs. PRPZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTRQX

PTRQX Risk / Return Rank: 25
PTRQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
PTRQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PTRQX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PTRQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
PTRQX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

PRPZX

PRPZX Risk / Return Rank: 52
PRPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PRPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
PRPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PRPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
PRPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTRQX vs. PRPZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) and PGIM Jennison MLP Fund (PRPZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTRQX	PRPZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.85	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.58	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.32	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	3.91	-2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.55	9.95	-4.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTRQX vs. PRPZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTRQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the PRPZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTRQX and PRPZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTRQX	PRPZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	1.85	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.64	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.33	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.24	+0.52

Drawdowns

PTRQX vs. PRPZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTRQX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum PRPZX drawdown of -69.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTRQX and PRPZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTRQX	PRPZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.72%	-69.62%	+48.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.08%	-6.63%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.47%	-34.52%	+29.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.69%	-34.52%	+13.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.72%	-62.23%	+41.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-6.93%	+5.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.29%	-20.07%	+16.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	2.60%	-1.58%

Volatility

PTRQX vs. PRPZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) is 1.95%, while PGIM Jennison MLP Fund (PRPZX) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that PTRQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRPZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTRQX	PRPZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.95%	5.89%	-3.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.20%	10.71%	-7.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.26%	14.04%	-9.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.02%	29.13%	-23.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.25%	28.81%	-23.56%

PTRQX vs. PRPZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTRQX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PRPZX's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTRQX vs. PRPZX - Dividend Comparison

PTRQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, less than PRPZX's 8.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRPZX PGIM Jennison MLP Fund	8.09%	11.68%	52.02%	6.53%	5.72%	5.23%	7.62%	6.95%	7.59%	6.24%	5.57%	6.43%
PTRQX PGIM Total Return Bond R6	4.68%	4.63%	4.89%	4.70%	5.83%	2.82%	3.05%	6.95%	3.99%	2.93%	4.01%	3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTRQX and PRPZX in my portfolio?

PTRQX and PRPZX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTRQX or PRPZX?

PRPZX has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to PTRQX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTRQX dropped -20.72% vs PRPZX's -69.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRPZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.