PTRQX vs. GTRAX
PTRQX (PGIM Total Return Bond R6) and GTRAX (PGIM Global Total Return Fund) are both mutual funds - PTRQX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by PGIM, while GTRAX is a Global Bonds fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 10 years, PTRQX returned 2.51%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for GTRAX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTRQX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for GTRAX.
Performance
PTRQX vs. GTRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTRQX achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than GTRAX's -0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PTRQX has outperformed GTRAX with an annualized return of 2.51%, while GTRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.37% annualized return.
PTRQX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.32%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
GTRAX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
PTRQX vs. GTRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTRQX PGIM Total Return Bond R6 | 0.43% | 7.81% | 3.06% | 7.80% | -14.30% | -1.37% | 8.13% | 10.85% | -0.73% | 6.67% |
GTRAX PGIM Global Total Return Fund | -0.16% | 10.63% | -0.37% | 8.37% | -22.39% | -6.36% | 9.79% | 14.99% | -1.88% | 13.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTRQX and GTRAX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011 | 0.69 |
The correlation between PTRQX and GTRAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTRQX vs. GTRAX — Risk / Return Rank
PTRQX
GTRAX
PTRQX vs. GTRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) and PGIM Global Total Return Fund (GTRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTRQX | GTRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.10 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 0.64 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 1.80 | +3.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTRQX vs. GTRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTRQX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum GTRAX drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTRQX and GTRAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTRQX | GTRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.72% | -33.63% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.08% | -4.60% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.47% | -6.84% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.69% | -31.81% | +11.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.72% | -33.63% | +12.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -13.44% | +11.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -5.83% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 1.62% | -0.55% |
Volatility
PTRQX vs. GTRAX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to PGIM Global Total Return Fund (GTRAX) at 1.57%. This indicates that PTRQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTRQX | GTRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.82% | 1.57% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.27% | 4.22% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 5.36% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.02% | 6.49% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 6.25% | -0.99% |
PTRQX vs. GTRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTRQX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GTRAX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTRQX vs. GTRAX - Dividend Comparison
PTRQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than GTRAX's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTRAX PGIM Global Total Return Fund | 3.68% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.02% | 3.22% | 3.03% | 3.63% | 8.40% | 3.40% | 3.17% | 3.70% | 3.55% |
PTRQX PGIM Total Return Bond R6 | 4.68% | 4.63% | 4.89% | 4.70% | 5.83% | 2.82% | 3.05% | 6.95% | 3.99% | 2.93% | 4.01% | 3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTRQX and GTRAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTRQX has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to GTRAX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTRQX dropped -20.72% vs GTRAX's -33.63%.
PTRQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTRQX and GTRAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer