PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTNQ vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTNQ vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTNQ achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's 11.78% return. Over the past 10 years, PTNQ has outperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 16.14%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively lower 15.02% annualized return.


PTNQ

1D
-0.52%
1M
8.66%
YTD
13.51%
6M
12.12%
1Y
31.85%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
16.14%

SCHB

1D
0.45%
1M
4.65%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.45%
1Y
28.80%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTNQ vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
13.51%7.18%15.47%34.65%-16.00%13.16%29.38%24.00%8.51%32.70%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.78%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PTNQ and SCHB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2015

0.81

The correlation between PTNQ and SCHB shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTNQ vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTNQ
SCHB

Technology

53.2%
34.4%

Communication Services

16.1%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
10.1%

Healthcare

5.3%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.6%

Industrials

4.3%
9.4%

Utilities

1.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.0%

Energy

0.5%
3.7%

Financial Services

0.3%
12.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.4%

Technology

PTNQ
53.2%
SCHB
34.4%

Communication Services

PTNQ
16.1%
SCHB
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PTNQ
12.9%
SCHB
10.1%

Healthcare

PTNQ
5.3%
SCHB
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

PTNQ
4.8%
SCHB
4.6%

Industrials

PTNQ
4.3%
SCHB
9.4%

Utilities

PTNQ
1.4%
SCHB
2.3%

Basic Materials

PTNQ
1.1%
SCHB
2.0%

Energy

PTNQ
0.5%
SCHB
3.7%

Financial Services

PTNQ
0.3%
SCHB
12.2%

Real Estate

PTNQ
0.1%
SCHB
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTNQ vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTNQ
PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTNQ vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTNQSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.25

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.24

14.90

-5.66

PTNQ vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTNQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTNQ and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTNQSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.39

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.75

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

0.82

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.83

-0.03

Drawdowns

PTNQ vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTNQ drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTNQ and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTNQSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-35.27%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-8.91%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.19%

-19.34%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

-25.41%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.07%

-35.27%

+7.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.27%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-4.11%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

1.94%

+1.52%

Volatility

PTNQ vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 2.97%. This indicates that PTNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTNQSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

2.97%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

9.14%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

12.11%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.89%

17.24%

-4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

18.31%

-1.94%

PTNQ vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTNQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTNQ vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than SCHB's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
0.78%0.88%1.96%1.47%0.62%0.00%0.16%0.44%0.45%0.32%0.30%0.22%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.01%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PTNQ and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PTNQ has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to SCHB (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTNQ dropped -28.07% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 10-year performance, PTNQ leads with 16.14% vs 15.02% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 16.14% return vs 15.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.78% for PTNQ.

PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTNQ and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTNQ and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer