PTNQ vs. INDS
PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) and INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index, while INDS is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTNQ returned 10.52%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for INDS. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTNQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for INDS.
Performance
PTNQ vs. INDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTNQ achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly lower than INDS's 10.90% return.
PTNQ
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 24.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 16.65%
INDS
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 15.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- —
PTNQ vs. INDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 9.80% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | -16.00% | 13.16% | 29.38% | 24.00% | -0.26% |
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 10.90% | 7.78% | -12.69% | 17.72% | -32.68% | 54.61% | 12.62% | 42.25% | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTNQ and INDS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PTNQ and INDS has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTNQ vs. INDS — Risk / Return Rank
PTNQ
INDS
PTNQ vs. INDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTNQ | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.17 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 1.25 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.92 | 3.77 | +3.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTNQ vs. INDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTNQ drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, smaller than the maximum INDS drawdown of -40.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTNQ and INDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTNQ | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -40.17% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -12.23% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.19% | -26.96% | +12.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -40.17% | +21.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.96% | -17.30% | +13.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -15.58% | +9.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 4.06% | -0.49% |
Volatility
PTNQ vs. INDS - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) at 4.94%. This indicates that PTNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTNQ | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 4.94% | +3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.68% | 12.50% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 16.52% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.40% | 20.17% | -6.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 23.06% | -6.55% |
PTNQ vs. INDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTNQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than INDS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTNQ vs. INDS - Dividend Comparison
PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than INDS's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 3.34% | 3.70% | 3.75% | 3.11% | 2.63% | 1.24% | 1.68% | 2.26% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.80% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTNQ and INDS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTNQ has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to INDS (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTNQ dropped -28.07% vs INDS's -40.17%.
On 5-year performance, PTNQ leads with 10.52% vs 1.31% for INDS. On fees, INDS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, INDS has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INDS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.
INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.80% for PTNQ.
PTNQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while INDS is REIT. PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index, while INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTNQ and 0.60% for INDS.
PTNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTNQ and INDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer