PTNQ vs. BUFX
PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTNQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
PTNQ vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTNQ achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.26% return.
PTNQ
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 13.51%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 31.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 16.14%
BUFX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTNQ vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 13.51% | 13.55% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.26% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTNQ and BUFX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTNQ vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
PTNQ
BUFX
PTNQ vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTNQ | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTNQ | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 2.72 | -1.92 |
Drawdowns
PTNQ vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTNQ drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTNQ and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTNQ | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -2.87% | -25.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | 0.00% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -0.24% | -5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | — | — |
Volatility
PTNQ vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTNQ | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 3.97% | +11.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 3.97% | +8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 3.97% | +12.40% |
PTNQ vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTNQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTNQ vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.78% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTNQ and BUFX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PTNQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PTNQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
PTNQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTNQ and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for PTNQ and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer