PTMC vs. CTEF
PTMC (Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. PTMC is passively managed, while CTEF is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
PTMC vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 25.60% return.
PTMC
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 12.33%
- 6M
- 11.93%
- 1Y
- 17.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 5.91%
CTEF
- 1D
- -3.23%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 25.60%
- 6M
- 26.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTMC vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF | 12.33% | 4.15% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 25.60% | 33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTMC and CTEF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTMC vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
PTMC
CTEF
PTMC vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTMC | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTMC | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 3.23 | -2.73 |
Drawdowns
PTMC vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTMC | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.53% | -15.00% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -3.30% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -1.79% | -4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | — | — |
Volatility
PTMC vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTMC | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.30% | 22.00% | -6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 22.00% | -8.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.99% | 22.00% | -9.01% |
PTMC vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTMC vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.87% | 1.92% | 0.82% | 0.12% | 0.53% | 1.40% | 0.89% | 0.67% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTMC and CTEF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.
PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.45% for CTEF.
Find the right allocation for PTMC and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer