PTMC vs. BMVP

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PTMC (Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF) and BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - PTMC tracks the Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index while BMVP tracks the Bloomberg MVP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTMC returned 5.91%/yr vs 9.36%/yr for BMVP. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BMVP.

Performance

PTMC vs. BMVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than BMVP's 6.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PTMC has underperformed BMVP with an annualized return of 5.91%, while BMVP has yielded a comparatively higher 9.36% annualized return.

PTMC

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 12.33%
• 6M: 11.93%
• 1Y: 17.22%
• 3Y*: 9.60%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 5.91%

BMVP

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 6.50%
• 6M: 6.17%
• 1Y: 10.18%
• 3Y*: 13.68%
• 5Y*: 6.23%
• 10Y*: 9.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTMC vs. BMVP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	12.33%	-1.55%	13.22%	7.29%	-13.99%	12.42%	6.58%	1.04%	0.02%	17.79%
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	6.50%	6.15%	17.46%	19.03%	-16.01%	19.38%	8.52%	13.47%	-6.40%	20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PTMC and BMVP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.65

The correlation between PTMC and BMVP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

PTMC vs. BMVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTMC	BMVP
Industrials	23.6%	16.8%
Technology	16.4%	16.4%
Financial Services	15.1%	16.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	10.6%
Healthcare	8.8%	9.7%
Real Estate	7.0%	5.5%
Basic Materials	4.9%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	5.1%
Energy	4.2%	5.2%
Utilities	3.0%	5.1%
Communication Services	1.4%	7.6%

Return for Risk

PTMC vs. BMVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTMC

PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 38
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 46

BMVP

BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 31
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTMC vs. BMVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTMC	BMVP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	1.05	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	1.57	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.18	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	1.58	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.12	4.85	+2.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTMC vs. BMVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the BMVP Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTMC and BMVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTMC	BMVP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	1.05	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.39	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.50	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.11	+0.39

Drawdowns

PTMC vs. BMVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, smaller than the maximum BMVP drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and BMVP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTMC	BMVP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.53%	-78.13%	+57.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-6.45%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.31%	-15.12%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.93%	-26.58%	+9.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.53%	-39.45%	+18.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-1.77%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.47%	-36.20%	+29.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	2.10%	+0.32%

Volatility

PTMC vs. BMVP - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) at 2.23%. This indicates that PTMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTMC	BMVP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	2.23%	+2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	7.22%	+4.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.30%	9.74%	+5.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.17%	16.06%	-2.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.99%	18.80%	-5.81%

PTMC vs. BMVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BMVP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTMC vs. BMVP - Dividend Comparison

PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than BMVP's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	1.67%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	1.64%	1.84%	0.87%	1.92%	0.82%	0.12%	0.53%	1.40%	0.89%	0.67%	0.66%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTMC and BMVP in my portfolio?

PTMC and BMVP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTMC or BMVP?

PTMC has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to BMVP (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs BMVP's -78.13%.

Which ETF is better, PTMC or BMVP?

On 10-year performance, BMVP leads with 9.36% vs 5.91% for PTMC. On fees, BMVP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTMC or BMVP?

Over the 10-year period, BMVP has performed better with a 9.36% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTMC or BMVP?

BMVP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTMC or BMVP?

BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.64% for PTMC.

What is the main difference between PTMC and BMVP?

PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index, while BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.29% for BMVP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.