PTLC vs. SCHK
PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - PTLC tracks the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index while SCHK tracks the Schwab 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTLC returned 9.99%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for SCHK. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PTLC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
PTLC vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTLC achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHK's 11.92% return.
PTLC
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.07%
SCHK
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.24M | $5.46M | $6.01M | |
| $27.70M | $27.97M | $27.91M |
PTLC vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 6.30% | 5.10% | 24.31% | 16.78% | -8.62% | 27.90% | -1.15% | 17.58% | 1.49% | 5.23% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 11.92% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 26.17% | 20.75% | 31.31% | -5.09% | 5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTLC and SCHK is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PTLC and SCHK shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (5 years) to 0.99 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTLC vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
PTLC
SCHK
PTLC vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTLC | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.59 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.22 | 11.09 | -3.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTLC vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTLC drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLC and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTLC | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.63% | -34.80% | +8.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.77% | -8.97% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.17% | -19.21% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.17% | -25.44% | +10.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | 0.00% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -5.11% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 2.09% | +0.27% |
Volatility
PTLC vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) have volatilities of 3.72% and 3.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTLC | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 3.78% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 10.36% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.25% | 13.10% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 17.36% | -5.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.18% | 19.05% | -5.87% |
PTLC vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTLC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTLC vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than SCHK's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.06% | 0.67% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.73% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.42% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, PTLC and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHK has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to PTLC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLC dropped -26.63% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 5-year performance, SCHK leads with 12.33% vs 9.99% for PTLC. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 9.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTLC.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 1.00% for PTLC.
PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index, while SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTLC and 0.03% for SCHK.
SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTLC and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer